Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 44.62.010 (2026)
Application to State Organization Act of 1959
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 44.62.010. Application to State Organization Act of 1959.
Rule-making power conferred by ch 64 SLA 1959 is subject to this chapter.
Rule-making power conferred by ch 64 SLA 1959 is subject to this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1973–2024 · leading case: State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc., 609 P.2d 520 (Alaska 1980).
State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc., 609 P.2d 520 (Alaska 1980). “AS 44.62.010 — 650. . AS 45.50.495. . See Jaffe, Judicial Control of Administrative Action 3-10 (1965).”
Ketchikan Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. State, Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 602 P.2d 434 (Alaska 1979). “The State characterizes the Board proceeding on May 25, 1977, as a "regular public meeting" during which only "informal decision-making" took place and at which appellants appeared informally to express opposition to the license application.”
In Re the Disciplinary Matter Involving Simpson, 645 P.2d 1223 (Alaska 1982). “provisions of the Alaska Administrative Procedure Act, AS 44.62.010- 650. The Act provided that the “substantial evidence” test was appropriate in such instances.”
McCarrey v. Comm'r of Nat. Resources, 526 P.2d 1353 (Alaska 1974). “AS 44.62.010 et seq. 4 . Cf. Mukluk Frgt.”
Johns v. Com. Fisheries Entry Comm'n, 758 P.2d 1256 (Alaska 1988). “2d at 927 ; AS 44.62.010 et seq. Johns admits that the APA does not specifically require a decisional statement when an agency promulgates a regulation, but nonetheless argues that we should impose such a rule.”
Forquer v. State, Com. Fisheries Entry Comm'n, 677 P.2d 1236 (Alaska 1984). “Appellants also state that the Commission failed to comply with the rule making provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, AS 44.62.010 — .44.62.370 and 44.62.640, thereby violating appellant’s rights to due process.”
Miller v. Treadwell, 245 P.3d 867 (Alaska 2010). “The Division begins with the total number of ballots cast in this election (258,746) and subtracts the total number of votes cast for candidates on the pre-printed ballot (153,579) and the total number of write-in votes it identified in its manual tally (103,805).”
Dep't of Corr. v. Kraus, 759 P.2d 539 (Alaska 1988). “It is clear Aat review of prison disciplinary proceedings is not covered by the Alaska Administrative Procedure Act, AS 44.62.010 — .650. Such review is not explicitly precluded by any statute.”
Wickersham v. State, Com. Fisheries Entry Comm'n, 680 P.2d 1135 (Alaska 1984). “First, appellants contend that the Commission’s practice of internally circulating memoran-da violated both the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), AS 44.62.010 — 44.62.650, and appellants’ rights to due process.”
State v. Kluti Kaah Native Vill. of Copper Ctr., 831 P.2d 1270 (Alaska 1992). “In addition to any other ground the court may declare the regulation invalid (1) for a substantial failure to comply with AS 44.62.010— 44.62.320. . Alaska Civil Rule 42(a) provides: When actions involving a common question of law or fact are pending before the court, it may…”
Jordan v. State, 681 P.2d 346 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984). “(a) The Board of Game may make regulations it considers advisable in accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act [AS 44.62.010 — 44.62.650] for [[Image here]] (3)establishment of the means and methods employed in the pursuit, capture and transport of game.”
State v. Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co., 723 P.2d 76 (Alaska 1986). “020 provides in part: AS 44.62.010 — 44.62.320 do not confer authority upon or augment the authority of a state agency to adopt, administer, or enforce a regulation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.