Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 17-25-308 (2026)

Grounds for revocation. [Effective July 1, 2020.]

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. The Contractors Licensing Board may revoke the certificate of license or registration of any contractor licensed or registered under this chapter who is found guilty of any fraud or deceit in obtaining a license or registration or for aiding or abetting any contractor or person to violate the provisions of this chapter or for gross negligence, incompetence, or misconduct in the conduct of the contractor's business.
  2. The board may revoke the certificate of license of a contractor licensed under this chapter who fails to obtain or maintain workers' compensation coverage as required under the Workers' Compensation Law, § 11-9-101 et seq., and § 17-25-514.

History. Acts 1965, No. 150, § 12; A.S.A. 1947, § 71-711; Acts 2009, No. 327, § 4; 2019, No. 805, § 13[14].

A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2019, No. 805, § 1, provided: “Legislative findings and intent.

“(a) The General Assembly finds that:

“(1) Arkansas is taking a leading role in the nationwide pursuit of reforms to the system of occupational licensing;

“(2) Arkansas became one (1) of eleven (11) states chosen to participate in the Occupational Licensing Policy Learning Consortium, an initiative funded by a grant from the United States Department of Labor and supported in partnership with the National Conference of State Legislatures, the Council of State Governments, and the National Governors Association;

“(3) Governor Asa Hutchinson appointed seventeen (17) individuals to the Red Tape Reduction Working Group to review and address occupational licensing regulations that create unnecessary barriers to labor market entry;

“(4) The Red Tape Reduction Working Group issued a final report to the Governor in the fall of 2018 with five (5) recommendations for substantive legislative reform, which are to:

“(A) Establish an expedited procedure for occupational licensing entities to collectively submit administrative rules that are responsive to new legislation;

“(B) Extend Acts 2017, No. 781, to allow repeal of subsections of rules;

“(C) Establish provisions to allow certain agencies to consider occupational relevance with regard to criminal background issues;

“(D) Authorize occupational licensing entities to identify types of individuals or entities that may be issued temporary or provisional licenses; and

“(E) Establish a systematic process for review of:

“(i) New occupational licensure and occupational licensing entities; and

“(ii) Existing occupational licensure and occupational licensing entities;

“(5) Several occupational licenses are needlessly regulated and could be deregulated or de-licensed without causing detrimental harm to the citizens of the State of Arkansas and the economy of the this state;

“(6) Research has found that occupational licensing reduces access to jobs, inhibits geographic mobility, and raises the costs of services; “(b) It is the intent of the General Assembly to amend the laws concerning contractors and to allow registration of subcontractors and eliminate the subcontractor licensing requirement”.

Publisher's Notes. For text of section effective until July 1, 2020, see the bound volume.

Amendments. The 2009 amendment inserted (b), redesignated the remaining text accordingly, and made a minor stylistic change.

The 2019 amendment, in (a), twice inserted “or registration” and inserted “or registered”.

Effective Dates. Acts 2019, No. 805, § 22[23]: July 1, 2020.

Case Notes

Construction with § 17-25-305.

This section provides the only reasons the board may revoke a contractor's license and does not state that the elements enumerated in § 17-25-305 may be used to determine if misconduct has occurred when considering revocation; this section and § 17-25-305 contain different provisions and requirements for different circumstances and may not be applied interchangeably. Ark. Contractors Licensing Bd. v. Pegasus Renovation Co., 347 Ark. 320, 64 S.W.3d 241 (2001).

Cited: Mid-South Rd. Bldrs., Inc. v. Ark. Contractors Licensing Bd., 328 Ark. 630, 946 S.W.2d 649 (1997).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1997–2002 · leading case: Arkansas Contractors Licensing Bd. v. Pegasus Renovation Co., 64 S.W.3d 241 (Ark. 2001).
Arkansas Contractors Licensing Bd. v. Pegasus Renovation Co., 64 S.W.3d 241 (Ark. 2001). · cites it 40× “" Both parties agree that the facts are undisputed in this case. During the mid-to-late Spring of 2000, Pegasus, a painting and drywall subcontractor, backed out of two projects, the Petit Jean Electric Cooperative project and the Farm Bureau Child Care Facility project, on…”
Arkansas Prof'l Bail Bondsman Licensing Bd. v. Oudin, 69 S.W.3d 855 (Ark. 2002). · cites it 4× “The list of acts deemed to be grounds for revocation of a license was contained in a specific statute, Ark. Code Ann. § 17-25-308 , and was different from the factors listed in a separate statute, Ark.”
Mid-South Road Builders, Inc. v. Arkansas Contractors Licensing Bd., 946 S.W.2d 649 (Ark. 1997). · cites it 4× “1995) provides: The Board shall have the power to revoke the certificate of license of any contractor licensed under this chapter who is found guilty of any fraud or deceit in obtaining a license or for aiding or abetting any contractor or person to violate the provisions of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.