Ark. Code Ann. § 5-64-710 (2026)
Denial of driving privileges for minor — Restricted permit
-
-
As used in this section “drug offense” means the:
- Possession, distribution, manufacture, cultivation, sale, transfer, or the attempt or conspiracy to possess, distribute, manufacture, cultivate, sell, or transfer any substance the possession of which is prohibited under this chapter; or
- Operation of a motor vehicle under the influence of any substance the possession of which is prohibited under this chapter.
-
As used in subdivision (a)(1) of this section:
-
- “Motor vehicle” means any vehicle that is self-propelled by which a person or thing may be transported upon a public highway and is registered in the State of Arkansas or of the type subject to registration in Arkansas.
-
“Motor vehicle” includes any:
- “Motorcycle”, “motor-driven cycle”, or “motorized bicycle”, as defined in § 27-20-101; and
- “Commercial motor vehicle”, as defined in § 27-23-103; and
- “Substance the possession of which is prohibited under this chapter” or “substance” means a “controlled substance” or “counterfeit substance”, as defined in the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, 21 U.S.C. § 802.
-
-
As used in this section “drug offense” means the:
-
-
- When a person who is under eighteen (18) years of age pleads guilty or nolo contendere to or is found guilty of driving or boating while intoxicated under the Omnibus DWI or BWI Act, § 5-65-101 et seq., a criminal offense involving the illegal possession or use of a controlled substance, or any drug offense in this state or any other state, the court having jurisdiction of the matter, including any federal court, shall prepare and transmit to the Department of Finance and Administration an order of denial of driving privileges for the person under eighteen (18) years of age.
- A court within the State of Arkansas shall prepare and transmit any order under subdivision (b)(1)(A) of this section to the department within twenty-four (24) hours after the plea or finding.
- A court outside Arkansas having jurisdiction over any person holding driving privileges issued by the State of Arkansas shall prepare and transmit any order under subdivision (b)(1)(A) of this section pursuant to an agreement or arrangement entered into between that state and the Director of the Department of Finance and Administration.
- An arrangement or agreement under subdivision (b)(1)(C) of this section may also provide for the forwarding by the department of an order issued by a court within this state to the state where any person holds driving privileges issued by that state.
- For any person holding driving privileges issued by the State of Arkansas, a court within this state in a case of extreme and unusual hardship may provide in an order for the issuance of a restricted driving permit to allow driving to and from a place of employment or driving to and from school.
-
-
- Except as provided in subdivision (c)(2) of this section, a penalty prescribed in this section and § 27-16-914 is in addition to any other penalty prescribed by law for an offense covered by this section and § 27-16-914.
- A juvenile adjudicated delinquent is subject to a juvenile disposition provided in § 9-27-330.
- In regard to any offense involving illegal possession under this section, it is a defense if the controlled substance is the property of an adult who owns the motor vehicle.
- If a juvenile is found delinquent for any offense described in subsection (a) or subsection (b) of this section, the circuit court may order any juvenile disposition available under § 9-27-330.
History. Acts 1989 (3rd Ex. Sess.), No. 93, §§ 1, 3, 4; 1993, No. 1257, § 1; 2005, No. 1876, § 1; 2005, No. 1994, § 314; 2015, No. 299, § 5.
A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 1993, No. 1257, § 7 provided:
“The Director of the Department of Finance and Administration is authorized to enter into any agreements or arrangements with other states and to take all action deemed necessary or proper, including the making and promulgation of rules and regulations, in order that the amendments contained in this Act may be effectuated.”
Amendments. The 2005 amendment by No. 1876 deleted “or is found by a juvenile court to have committed such an offense” preceding “the court having jurisdiction” in (b)(1)(A); added the subdivision (1) designation in (c) and added (c)(2); substituted “Except as provided in subdivision (c)(2) of this section, penalties” for “Penalties” in present (c)(1); and added (e).
The 2005 amendment by No. 1994 substituted “this chapter” for “the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, § 5-64-101 et seq.” in (a)(1).
The 2015 amendment, in (b)(1)(A), substituted “under eighteen” for “less than eighteen”, inserted “or boating”, inserted “the Omnibus DWI or BWI Act”, substituted “a criminal offense” for “any criminal offense”, and substituted “person under eighteen (18) years of age” for “minor”.
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Survey, Criminal Law, 12 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 617.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
The classification drawn at age eighteen in Acts 1989, No. 93 was reasonable and does not approach the level of irrationality or arbitrariness necessary to deem it unconstitutional. Carney v. State, 305 Ark. 431, 808 S.W.2d 755 (1991).
Cited: Manatt v. State, 311 Ark. 17, 842 S.W.2d 845 (1992).
Subchapter 8 — Sale of Drug Devices
Research References
U. Ark. Little Rock L.J.
Legislative Survey, Criminal Law, 4 U. Ark. Little Rock L.J. 583.
Case Notes
Constitutionality.
Acts 1981, No. 946 which enacted this subchapter prohibiting the operation of an illegal drug paraphernalia business, is not unconstitutionally overbroad, nor does it violate the due process rights of business owners on the claimed ground that discriminatory enforcement is a hypothetical possibility. Garner v. White, 726 F.2d 1274 (8th Cir. 1984).
Acts 1981, No. 946 which enacted this subchapter, satisfies the fair notice due process requirements of what conduct is prohibited because in order to violate this section the offender must not only be distributing on a regular basis devices which are usable with illegal drugs, but the offender must also know or have reason to know that the objects are designed to be primarily useful as drug devices. Garner v. White, 726 F.2d 1274 (8th Cir. 1984).