Arkansas Code Annotated

Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330 (2026)

Disposition — Delinquency — Alternatives

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section JustiaArk. Code CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
  1. If a juvenile is found to be delinquent, the circuit court may enter an order making any of the following dispositions based upon the best interest of the juvenile:
      1. Transfer legal custody of the juvenile to any licensed agency responsible for the care of delinquent juveniles or to a relative or other individual.
        1. Commit the juvenile to the Division of Youth Services using the validated risk assessment system for Arkansas juvenile offenders selected by the Juvenile Judges Committee of the Arkansas Judicial Council with the division and distributed and administered by the Administrative Office of the Courts.
          1. The validated risk assessment system selected by the Juvenile Judges Committee of the Arkansas Judicial Council with the division shall be:
            1. The only validated risk assessment used by courts for commitment;
            2. Used throughout the state; and
            3. Applied to all commitment decisions for all juvenile offenders.
          2. The validated risk assessment may be changed to another validated risk assessment system by the Juvenile Judges Committee of the Arkansas Judicial Council with the division.
          1. In an order of commitment, the court may recommend that a juvenile be placed in a treatment program or community-based program instead of a youth services center and shall make specific findings in support of such a placement in the order.
          2. The court shall also specify in its recommendation whether it is requesting a division aftercare plan upon the juvenile's release from the division.
          3. A court may not commit a juvenile to the division if the juvenile is adjudicated delinquent of only a misdemeanor offense unless the:
            1. Juvenile is determined to be moderate risk or high risk by the validated risk assessment; and
            2. Court makes specific findings as to the factors considered for the disposition to be in the juvenile's best interest.
          4. A court may not commit a juvenile to the division if the juvenile is adjudicated delinquent of only a misdemeanor offense and the juvenile is determined to be low risk by the validated risk assessment.
        2. A circuit court committing a juvenile to the division under subdivision (a)(1)(B)(iii) of this section shall make written findings and consider the following factors in making its determination to commit the juvenile to the division:
          1. The previous history of the juvenile, including without limitation whether:
            1. The juvenile has been adjudicated delinquent and, if so, whether the offense was against a person or property; and
            2. Any other previous history of antisocial behavior or patterns of physical violence exist;
          2. Whether the circuit court has previously offered less restrictive programs or services to the juvenile and whether there are less restrictive programs or services available to the court that are likely to rehabilitate the juvenile before the expiration of the court's jurisdiction;
          3. Written reports and other materials relating to the juvenile's mental, physical, educational, and social history; and
          4. Any other factors deemed relevant by the circuit court.
        3. Upon receipt of an order of commitment with recommendations for placement, the division shall consider the recommendations of the committing court in placing a juvenile in a youth services facility or a community-based program.
        4. Upon receipt of an order of commitment, the division or its contracted provider or designee shall prepare a written treatment plan that:
          1. States the treatment plan for the juvenile, including the types of programs and services that will be provided to the juvenile;
          2. States the anticipated length of the juvenile's commitment;
            1. States recommendations as to the most appropriate post-commitment placement for the juvenile.
            2. If the juvenile cannot return to the custody of his or her parent, guardian, or custodian because of child maltreatment, which includes the parent's, guardian's, or custodian's refusing to take responsibility for the juvenile, the division shall immediately contact the Office of Chief Counsel of the Department of Human Services.
            3. The Office of Chief Counsel of the Department of Human Services shall petition the committing court to determine the issue of custody of the juvenile;
          3. States any post-commitment community-based services that will be offered to the juvenile and to his or her family by the division or the community-based provider;
            1. Outlines an aftercare plan, if recommended, including specific terms and conditions required of the juvenile and the community-based provider.
            2. If the juvenile progresses in treatment and an aftercare plan is no longer recommended or the terms of the aftercare plan need to be amended as a result of treatment changes, any change in the terms of the aftercare plan and conditions shall be provided in writing and shall be explained to the juvenile.
            3. The terms and conditions shall be provided also to the prosecuting attorney, the juvenile's attorney, and to the juvenile's legal parent, guardian, or custodian by the division or its designee before the juvenile's release from the division.
            4. All aftercare terms shall be provided to the committing court; and
            1. The treatment plan shall be filed with the committing court no later than thirty (30) days from the date of the commitment order or before the juvenile's release, whichever is sooner.
            2. A copy of the written treatment plan shall be provided and shall be explained to the juvenile.
            3. A copy shall be provided to the prosecutor, the juvenile's attorney, and to the juvenile's legal parent, guardian, or custodian and shall be filed in the court files of any circuit court where a dependency-neglect or family in need of services case concerning that juvenile is pending.
              1. To a juvenile detention facility, as provided in subdivision (a)(11) of this section;
              2. To a youth services center operated by the Department of Human Services State Institutional System Board, as provided in subdivision (a)(1) of this section; or
              3. Place the juvenile on residential detention, as provided in subdivision (a)(12) of this section.
      2. This transfer of custody shall not include placement of adjudicated delinquents into the custody of the Department of Human Services for the purpose of foster care except as under the Child Maltreatment Act, § 12-18-101 et seq.;
    1. Order the juvenile or members of the juvenile's family to submit to physical, psychiatric, or psychological evaluations;
    2. Grant permanent custody to an individual upon proof that the parent or guardian from whom the juvenile has been removed has not complied with the orders of the court and that no further services or periodic reviews are required;
      1. Place the juvenile on probation under those conditions and limitations that the court may prescribe pursuant to § 9-27-339(a).
        1. In addition, the court shall have the right as a term of probation to require the juvenile to attend school or make satisfactory progress toward attaining a high school equivalency diploma approved by the Adult Education Section of the Division of Workforce Services of the Department of Commerce.
        2. The court shall have the right to revoke probation if the juvenile fails to regularly attend school or if satisfactory progress toward attaining a high school equivalency diploma approved by the Adult Education Section of the Division of Workforce Services of the Department of Commerce is not being made;
    3. Order a probation fee, not to exceed twenty dollars ($20.00) per month, as provided in § 16-13-326(a);
    4. Assess a court cost of no more than thirty-five dollars ($35.00) to be paid by the juvenile, his or her parent, both parents, or his or her guardian;
      1. Order restitution to be paid by the juvenile, a parent, both parents, the guardian, or his or her custodian.
      2. If the custodian is the State of Arkansas, both liability and the amount that may be assessed shall be determined by the Arkansas State Claims Commission;
    5. Order a fine of not more than five hundred dollars ($500) to be paid by the juvenile, a parent, both parents, or the guardian;
    6. Order that the juvenile and his or her parent, both parents, or the guardian perform court-approved volunteer service in the community designed to contribute to the rehabilitation of the juvenile or to the ability of the parent or guardian to provide proper parental care and supervision of the juvenile, not to exceed one hundred sixty (160) hours;
      1. Order that the parent, both parents, or the guardian of the juvenile attend a court-approved parental responsibility training program if available.
      2. The court may make reasonable orders requiring proof of completion of the training program within a certain time period and payment of a fee covering the cost of the training program.
      3. The court may provide that any violation of such orders shall subject the parent, both parents, or the guardian to the contempt sanctions of the court;
        1. Order that the juvenile remain in a juvenile detention facility for an indeterminate period not to exceed ninety (90) days.
        2. The court may further order that the juvenile be eligible for work release or to attend school or other educational or vocational training.
      1. The juvenile detention facility shall afford opportunities for education, recreation, and other rehabilitative services to adjudicated delinquents;
    7. Place the juvenile on residential detention with electronic monitoring, either in the juvenile's home or in another facility as ordered by the court;
      1. Order the parent, both parents, or the guardian of any juvenile adjudicated delinquent and committed to a youth services center, detained in a juvenile detention facility, or placed on electronic monitoring to be liable for the cost of the commitment, detention, or electronic monitoring.
        1. The court shall take into account the financial ability of the parent, both parents, or the guardian to pay for the commitment, detention, or electronic monitoring.
        2. The court shall take into account the past efforts of the parent, both parents, or the guardian to correct the delinquent juvenile's conduct.
        3. If the parent is a noncustodial parent, the court shall take into account the opportunity the parent has had to correct the delinquent juvenile's conduct.
        4. The court shall take into account any other factors the court deems relevant;
    8. When a juvenile is committed to a youth services center or detained in a juvenile detention facility and the juvenile is covered by private health insurance, order the parent or guardian to provide information on the juvenile's health insurance coverage, including a copy of the health insurance policy and the pharmacy card when available, to the juvenile detention center or youth services center that has physical custody of the juvenile; or
      1. Order the Department of Finance and Administration to suspend the driving privileges of any juvenile adjudicated delinquent.
      2. The order shall be prepared and transmitted to the Department of Finance and Administration within twenty-four (24) hours after the juvenile has been found delinquent and is sentenced to have his or her driving privileges suspended.
      3. The court may provide in the order for the issuance of a restricted driving permit to allow driving to and from a place of employment or driving to and from school or for other circumstances.
  2. The court shall specifically retain jurisdiction to amend or modify any orders entered pursuant to this section.
    1. If a juvenile is adjudicated delinquent for possession of a handgun, as provided in § 5-73-119, or criminal use of prohibited weapons, as provided in § 5-73-104, or possession of a defaced firearm, as provided in § 5-73-107, then the court shall commit the juvenile:
    2. The court may take into consideration any preadjudication detention period served by the juvenile and sentence the juvenile to time served.
    1. When the court orders restitution pursuant to subdivision (a)(7) of this section, the court shall consider the following:
      1. The amount of restitution may be decided:
        1. If the juvenile is to be responsible for the restitution, by agreement between the juvenile and the victim;
        2. If the parent or parents are to be responsible for the restitution, by agreement between the parent or parents and the victim;
        3. If the juvenile and the parent or parents are to be responsible for the restitution, by agreement between the juvenile, his or her parent or parents, and the victim; or
        4. At a hearing at which the state must prove the restitution amount by a preponderance of the evidence;
      2. Restitution shall be made immediately unless the court determines that the parties should be given a specified time to pay or should be allowed to pay in specified installments; and
        1. In determining if restitution should be paid and by whom, as well as the method and amount of payment, the court shall take into account:
          1. The financial resources of the juvenile, his or her parent, both parents, or the guardian and the burden the payment will impose with regard to the other obligations of the paying party;
          2. The ability to pay restitution on an installment basis or on other conditions to be fixed by the court;
          3. The rehabilitative effect of the payment of restitution and the method of payment; and
          4. The past efforts of the parent, both parents, or the guardian to correct the delinquent juvenile's conduct.
          1. The court shall take into account whether the parent is a noncustodial parent.
          2. The court may take into consideration the opportunity the parent has had to correct the delinquent juvenile's conduct.
        2. The court shall take into account any other factors the court deems relevant.
    2. If the juvenile is placed on probation, any restitution ordered under this section may be a condition of the probation.
  3. When an order of restitution is entered, it may be collected by any means authorized for the enforcement of money judgments in civil actions, and it shall constitute a lien on the real and personal property of the persons and entities the order of restitution is directed upon in the same manner and to the same extent as a money judgment in a civil action.
    1. The judgment entered by the court may be in favor of the state, the victim, or any other appropriate beneficiary.
    2. The judgment may be discharged by a settlement between the parties ordered to pay restitution and the beneficiaries of the judgment.
  4. The court shall determine priority among multiple beneficiaries on the basis of the seriousness of the harm each suffered, their other resources, and other equitable factors.
  5. If more than one (1) juvenile is adjudicated delinquent of an offense for which there is a judgment under this section, the juveniles are jointly and severally liable for the judgment, unless the court determines otherwise.
    1. A judgment under this section does not bar a remedy available in a civil action under other law.
    2. A payment under this section must be credited against a money judgment obtained by the beneficiary of the payment in a civil action.
    3. A determination under this section and the fact that payment was or was not ordered or made are not admissible in evidence in a civil action and do not affect the merits of the civil action.
  6. If a juvenile is adjudicated delinquent as an extended juvenile jurisdiction offender, the court shall enter the following dispositions:
    1. Order any of the juvenile delinquency dispositions authorized by this section; and
    2. Suspend the imposition of an adult sentence pending court review.

History. Acts 1989, No. 273, § 29; 1991, No. 763, § 1; 1993, No. 1227, § 4; 1994 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 61, § 1; 1994 (2nd Ex. Sess.), No. 62, § 1; 1995, No. 533, § 9; 1995, No. 779, § 1; 1995, No. 798, § 1; 1995, No. 1261, § 14; 1995, No. 1335, § 1; 1995, No. 1337, § 5; 1997, No. 1118, § 3; 1999, No. 1192, § 19; 1999, No. 1340, §§ 15, 16; 2003, No. 1166, § 16; 2003, No. 1319, § 17; 2003, No. 1809, § 6; 2005, No. 1990, § 9; 2007, No. 587, § 16; 2009, No. 758, § 14; 2009, No. 956, § 12; 2015, No. 1115, § 22; 2019, No. 189, § 4; 2019, No. 910, § 2194.

A.C.R.C. Notes. Acts 2019, No. 189, § 1, provided: “This act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘Restoring Arkansas Families Act’.”

Acts 2019, No. 189, § 2, provided: “Legislative findings and intent.

“(a) The General Assembly finds:

“(1) The Youth Justice Reform Board was established by Acts 2015, No. 1010, bringing together stakeholders from across the state to develop a series of recommendations for youth justice reform in Arkansas;

“(2) Stakeholder groups represented on the board include:

“(A) Families and youth involved in the juvenile system;

“(B) The Department of Education;

“(C) The Department of Workforce Services;

“(D) The Department of Human Services;

“(E) Youth services providers;

“(F) Juvenile judges;

“(G) The Administrative Office of the Courts;

“(H) Prosecuting attorneys;

“(I) Public defenders;

“(J) Youth advocates; and

“(K) Experts in adolescent development; and

“(3) In 2017, the board worked with the Arkansas Supreme Court Commission on Children, Youth, and Families to identify concerns and priorities for legislative action.

“(b) The purpose of this act is to:

“(1) Maintain public safety and improve outcomes for Arkansas youth and families involved in the juvenile justice system through validated risk assessments;

“(2) Reduce the number of secure out-of-home placements;

“(3) Redirect funding from secure residential facilities to evidence-based community services;

“(4) Equitably allocate services in and across each judicial district;

“(5) Enhance treatment for youth committed to the Division of Youth Services; and

“(6) Serve youth and families through evidence-based programs selected through a collaboration between the Department of Human Services, the judiciary, and community-based providers.”

Amendments. The 2005 amendment inserted “or the prosecuting attorney in the county in which the juvenile was committed” in (a)(1)(B)(v) (b) and (c)

The 2007 amendment inserted “Judges” in (a)(1)(B)(ii); inserted present (a)(14); and redesignated former (a)(14) as (a)(15).

The 2009 amendment by No. 758 substituted “under the Child Maltreatment Act, § 12-18-101 et seq.” for “in § 12-12-516” in (a)(1)(C).

The 2009 amendment by No. 956 substituted “the Division of Youth Services of the Department of Human Services” for “a youth services center” in (a)(1)(B)(i); inserted (a)(1)(B)(iii) (b) , redesignated the existing text of (a)(1)(B)(iii) accordingly, and inserted “treatment program or” in (a)(1)(B)(iii) (a) ; substituted “juvenile” for “youth” in (a)(1)(B)(iv); rewrote (a)(1)(B)(v); and made minor stylistic changes.

The 2015 amendment substituted “high school equivalency diploma approved by the Department of Career Education” for “general educational development certificate” in (a)(4)(B)(i) and (ii).

The 2019 amendment by No. 189, in (a)(1)(B)(i), deleted “of the Department of Human Services” following “Division of Youth Services”, inserted “validated”, and inserted “selected by the Juvenile Judges Committee of the Arkansas Judicial Council with the division and”; inserted (a)(1)(B)(ii) (a) and redesignated former (a)(1)(B)(ii) as (a)(1)(B)(ii) (b) ; in (a)(1)(B)(ii) (b) , inserted the first occurrence of “validated”, and substituted “changed to another validated risk assessment system” for “modified”; inserted (a)(1)(B)(iii) (c) through (a)(1)(B)(iv) and redesignated former (a)(1)(B)(iv) and (a)(1)(B)(v) as (a)(1)(B)(v) and (a)(1)(B)(vi).

The 2019 amendment by No. 910 substituted “Adult Education Section of the Division of Workforce Services” for “Department of Career Education” in (a)(4)(B)(i) and (ii).

Cross References. Graduated community-based sanctions for delinquent juveniles, § 9-28-701 et seq.

Mandated release of personal information concerning certain juvenile escapees, § 9-28-215.

Reimbursement for educational services provided in juvenile detention facilities, § 6-20-104.

Risk and needs assessments, § 9-27-368.

Research References

ALR.

State Statutes or Ordinances Requiring Persons Previously Convicted of Crime to Register with Authorities as Applied to Juvenile Offenders — Duty to Register, Requirements for Registration, and Procedural Matters. 38 A.L.R.6th 1.

State Statutes or Ordinances Requiring Persons Previously Convicted of Crime to Register with Authorities as Applied to Juvenile Offenders — Expungement, Stay or Deferral, Exceptions, Exemptions, and Waiver. 39 A.L.R.6th 577.

Case Notes

Commitment.

Chancellor lacked authority to order commitment of a juvenile offender to a serious offender program within the youth services center. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. State, 319 Ark. 749, 894 S.W.2d 592 (1995).

Juvenile court properly revoked a juvenile’s probation and committed him to the Arkansas Department of Human Services, Division of Youth Services (DYS) because he did not challenge the evidence that he failed to obey the condition that he refrain from using alcohol, he cited no authority to support his contention that his disposition was unwarranted, and the juvenile court was statutorily authorized, upon finding the juvenile to be delinquent, to commit him to DYS upon revoking his probation. C.C. v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 262 (2014).

Department of Human Services.

Department of Human Services is a custodian for purposes of this section and § 9-27-331. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. State, 312 Ark. 481, 850 S.W.2d 847 (1993).

Although no one has filed a lawsuit against the Department of Human Services seeking costs and restitution, but the court has imposed, under statutory authority, costs and restitutionary awards against the state agency in connection with delinquency proceedings in which the agency acted as a custodian of a juvenile, because the State will no doubt be coerced to bear the financial obligation to pay costs and restitution if the orders are upheld, the suit is one against the State for the purpose of determining whether sovereign immunity applies. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. State, 312 Ark. 481, 850 S.W.2d 847 (1993).

The appearance of the Department of Human Services (DHS) subsequent to complaints being filed against juveniles, pursuant to DHS's obligation to obtain custody of the juveniles in dependency-neglect proceedings and appear in delinquency proceedings, is not a voluntary waiver of sovereign immunity, because DHS is under an obligation to appear. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. State, 312 Ark. 481, 850 S.W.2d 847 (1993).

Denial of motion to intervene by the Department of Human Services in a juvenile delinquency case was affirmed; the department could appeal from the order denying its motion to set aside the commitment order without needing to intervene in the underlying matter. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. State, 2017 Ark. App. 137, 516 S.W.3d 743 (2017).

Probation Fee.

The trial court cannot assess a probation fee against a custodian under this section or § 9-27-331, since this section does not authorize the assessment of a probation fee against a custodian, and a juvenile court's authority to assess a probation fee is based upon § 16-13-326(a), which is silent on assessing a probation fee against a custodian. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. State, 312 Ark. 481, 850 S.W.2d 847 (1993).

Protective Supervision.

Under factual allegations of petition, there was no basis for construing the term “protective supervision” in former statute as requiring only the administration of a state agency. Woodruff v. Shockey, 297 Ark. 595, 764 S.W.2d 431 (1989) (decision under prior law).

Restitution.

Trial court did not err when it ordered defendant juvenile to pay restitution because it was not necessary for defendant to be adjudicated for any offense other than theft by receiving to impose restitution. J.L. v. State, 2018 Ark. App. 629, 567 S.W.3d 80 (2018).

Trial Court's Authority.

Trial court's order did not violate § 9-28-207 as it did not dictate placement but stated only that if the juvenile was going to be in the Department of Human Services' custody, he had to receive treatment. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs. v. State, 2017 Ark. App. 137, 516 S.W.3d 743 (2017).

Cited: Avery v. State, 311 Ark. 391, 844 S.W.2d 364 (1993); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Burrough, 120 F.3d 834 (8th Cir. 1997); B.J. v. State, 56 Ark. App. 35, 937 S.W.2d 675 (1997); McGill v. State, 60 Ark. App. 246, 962 S.W.2d 382 (1998); K.N. v. State, 360 Ark. 579, 203 S.W.3d 103 (2005).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 31 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2023 · leading case: Heagerty v. State, 983 S.W.2d 908 (Ark. 1998).
Heagerty v. State, 983 S.W.2d 908 (Ark. 1998). · cites it 15× “See Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330 (Repl. 1998). But commitment itself is lacking as a rehabilitative prospect for Heagerty.”
Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs. v. State, 850 S.W.2d 847 (Ark. 1993). · cites it 7× “This appeal is from five instances in which a Chancery Court, Juvenile Division, held the Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS) liable for court costs, probation fees, and restitution to victims as a delinquent juvenile’s custodian pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330 (5)…”
Hunter v. State, 19 S.W.3d 607 (Ark. 2000). · cites it 4× “5 This act amended Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330 , one of the disposition sections of the juvenile code.”
Golden v. State, 21 S.W.3d 801 (Ark. 2000). · cites it 2× “See Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330 (Repl. 1998). In adult criminal circuit court, the trial judge has no options regarding disposition where a defendant suffering from a mental disease or defect is concerned.”
Heagerty v. State, 983 S.W.2d 908 (Ark. 1998). · cites it 15× “See Ark.Code Ann. § 9-27-330 (Repl. 1998). But commitment itself is lacking as a rehabilitative prospect for Heagerty.”
T.C. v. State, 342 S.W.3d 832 (Ark. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 9× “§ 9-27-330 (Supp.2007) 1 Appellant contends that Arkansas Code Annotated section 9-27-330 2 does not authorize a court to place a child on probation for a period of more than two years.”
McGill v. State, 962 S.W.2d 382 (Ark. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 4× “See Ark.Code Ann. § 9-27-330 (Repl.1993). Thus, unlike the situation typified by Tigue , modifying the basis for the delinquency charge to criminal mischief in the second degree leaves us with little or no guidance for fixing appellant's punishment.”
T.C. v. State, 364 S.W.3d 53 (Ark. 2010). · cites it 4× “contends that Arkansas Code Annotated section 9-27-330 does not authorize probation for a period of more than two years.”
K.N. v. State, 203 S.W.3d 103 (Ark. 2005). · cites it 4× “entered a plea of guilty, the trial court could have ordered detention under Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330 (a)(11) (Supp. 2003) and probation with the condition of receiving inpatient drug treatment pursuant to Ark.”
Sharp v. State, 548 S.W.3d 846 (Ark. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 2× “Tanner testified as to the circuit courts release authority over appellant until he turns twenty-one, and that up to the age of twenty-one, the circuit court would have *855 the ability to revisit any adult disposition under section 9-27-330. He explained the review, services,…”
Manatt v. State, 842 S.W.2d 845 (Ark. 1992). · cites it 2× “The salient fact is that there was no “disposition,” such as commitment to a youth services center, probation, or fine, as provided for in Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330 (1987), the statute that appellant contends unconstitutionally provides excessive punishment for juveniles.”
Heagerty v. State, 971 S.W.2d 793 (Ark. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 6× “See Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330 (Supp. 1995). More importantly, since Hogan was decided in 1992, the legislature in 1995 greatly expanded the dispositions available to the juvenile court upon a finding of delinquency, from eight to fifteen.”
— Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330(a) — 2 cases
Matter of Welfare of CAW, 579 N.W.2d 494 (Minn. Ct. App. 1998).
Minor Child v. State of Arkansas, 2023 Ark. App. 184 (Ark. Ct. App. 2023).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330(a)(1)(B) — 1 case
TC v. State, 364 S.W.3d 53 (Ark. 2010).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330(a)(14) — 1 case
Minor Child v. State of Arkansas, 2023 Ark. App. 184 (Ark. Ct. App. 2023).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330(a)(4)(A) — 3 cases
T.C. v. State, 342 S.W.3d 832 (Ark. Ct. App. 2009). “§ 9-27-330 (Supp.2007) 1 Appellant contends that Arkansas Code Annotated section 9-27-330 2 does not authorize a court to place a child on probation for a period of more than two years.”
J.P. v. State, 462 S.W.3d 358 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015).
J.P. v. State, 462 S.W.3d 358 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330(a)(6) — 2 cases
J.P. v. State, 462 S.W.3d 358 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015).
J.P. v. State, 462 S.W.3d 358 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330(a)(7) — 2 cases
J.P. v. State, 462 S.W.3d 358 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015).
J.P. v. State, 462 S.W.3d 358 (Ark. Ct. App. 2015).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330(a)(7)(A) — 1 case
Minor Child v. State of Arkansas, 2023 Ark. App. 184 (Ark. Ct. App. 2023).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330(a)(8) — 1 case
Minor Child v. State of Arkansas, 2023 Ark. App. 184 (Ark. Ct. App. 2023).
— Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330(a)(9) — 1 case
Hunter v. State, 19 S.W.3d 607 (Ark. 2000). “5 This act amended Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330 , one of the disposition sections of the juvenile code.”
— Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330(a)(l)(B) — 1 case
T.C. v. State, 364 S.W.3d 53 (Ark. 2010). “contends that Arkansas Code Annotated section 9-27-330 does not authorize probation for a period of more than two years.”
— Ark. Code Ann. § 9-27-330(a)(l)(B)(iii) — 1 case
Arkansas Dep't of Human Servs. v. State, 2017 Ark. App. 137 (Ark. Ct. App. 2017).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.