Santiago v. Warden, State Prison, 614 A.2d 825 (Conn. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Santiago v. Warden, State Prison, 614 A.2d 825 (Conn. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
46 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Mollo (connappct, 2018-04-10)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Mollo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Miller v. Bourgoin , 28 Conn. App. 491 , 499-500, 613 A.2d 292 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 927 , 614 A.2d 825 (1992) ; Cummings & Lockwood v. Gray , 26 Conn. App. 293 , 299-300, 600 A.2d 1040 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" Righi v. Righi
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pullman, Comley, Bradley & Reeves v. Tuck-it-Away, Bridgeport, Inc. , 28 Conn.App. 460 , 464, 611 A.2d 435 (court's memorandum of decision contained "all of the necessary subordinate findings to support the conclusion that [the defendant] had anticipatorily breached the contract as claimed at trial by [another defendant], even though it did not, in fact, use the talismanic words 'anticipatory breach' "), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 926 , 614 A.2d 825 (1992) ; Nielsen v. Wisniewski , 32 Conn.App. 133 , 139, 628 A.2d 25 (1993) (a finding of "wrongful conduct" was sufficient to affirm an award of…
discussed Cited "see" Riverbend Exec. Ctr. v. Modern Telecomm., No. Cv97 0157888 S (Jun. 1, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Miller v. Bourgoin , 28 Conn. App. 491 , 498 , 613 A.2d 292 , CT Page 6712 cert. denied, 223 Conn. 927 , 614 A.2d 825 (1992) ("Where `a definite date for performance is specified in the agreement, but performance on time is not of the essence, either party has power to make on that date or on some subsequent date performance essential . . . provided that the notice leaves a reasonable time for rendering the performance.'"); see also Bradford Novelty Co. v. Technomatic, Inc. , 142 Conn. 166 , 172 , 112 A.2d 214 (1955) ("[T]he plaintiff having acquiesced in the nonperformance of the contract…
discussed Cited "see" Fruin v. Colonnade One at Old Greenwich Ltd. Partnership
Conn. App. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pullman, Comley, Bradley & Reeves v. Tuck-it away, Bridgeport, Inc., 28 Conn. App. 460 , 611 A.2d 435 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 926 , 614 A.2d 825 (1992); see also Sagamore Corp. v. Willcutt, 120 Conn. 315 , 180 A. 464 (1935).
discussed Cited "see" Cassotto v. Winchester Board of Education, No. Cv930062801 (Nov. 15, 1994)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Miller v. Bourgoin , 28 Conn. App. 491 , 497-98 , 613 A.2d 292 (Summary judgment procedure is inappropriate where the inferences which the parties seek to have drawn deal with questions of motive, intent and subjective feelings and reactions), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 927 , 614 A.2d 825 (1992).
discussed Cited "see" Nielsen v. Wisniewski
Conn. App. Ct. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pullman, Com- ley, Bradley & Reeves v. Tuck-it-away, Bridgeport, Inc., 28 Conn. App. 460, 464 , 611 A.2d 435 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 926 , 614 A.2d 825 (1992) (use of talismanic words is not required where memorandum of decision contains all necessary subordinate findings to support trial court’s conclusion).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United Cleaning & Restoration, LLC v. Koskerides
Conn. App. Ct. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
The fact that a contract states a date for performance does not neces- sarily make time of the essence.’’ (Citations omitted; emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Cam, 172 Conn. App. 659, 666 , 161 A.3d 650 (2017); see also Miller v. Bour- goin, 28 Conn. App. 491, 498 , 613 A.2d 292 (observing that, ‘‘[b]ecause delays are typical in transactions involving real property or building contracts, time is ordinarily not of the essence in these contracts’’), cert. denied, 223 Conn. 927 , 614 A.2d 825 (1992).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Hubbard
Conn. App. Ct. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
The defendant took several general exceptions to the rulings made against him, but he failed to inform the trial court of his grounds for the exceptions. “ Tf a defendant . . . wishes to except to a ruling excluding evidence which was objected to only generally, he must avail himself of the provisions of [Practice Book § 288] and state his claim of admissibility. . . ” State v. De Santis, 178 Conn. 534, 540 , 423 A.2d 149 (1979); see also Raino v. Supermarkets General Corporation, 28 Conn. App. 56, 59 , 609 A.2d 1047 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 924 , 614 A.2d 825 (1992); O & G Industries, I…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Victor Santiago
v.
Warden, State Prison
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 17, 1992.
614 A.2d 825
Paula Mangini Montonye, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Kevin T. Kane, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The petitioner’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 780, is denied.