Talton v. Warden, State Prison, 636 A.2d 850 (Conn. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Talton v. Warden, State Prison, 636 A.2d 850 (Conn. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“parties may alter any term of an existing contract by entering into a subsequent contract. . . .”
17 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mercantile Bank v. Hurowitz, No. Cv 95 0381091 S (May 2, 2000) (connsuperct, 2000-05-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Mercantile Bank v. Hurowitz, No. Cv 95 0381091 S (May 2, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
parties may alter any term of an existing contract by entering into a subsequent contract. . . .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Napier Talton
v.
Warden, State Prison
SC 14874.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 13, 1994.
636 A.2d 850
James Moreno, special public defender, in support of the petition., John A. East III, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 71%
Citer courts: Connecticut Superior Court (1)

The petitioner Napier Talton’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 33 Conn. App. 171 (AC 11055), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that, based on the record of the habeas proceeding, the habeas court properly determined that the recantation testimony of the victim-witness was not credible?
“2. If the recantation testimony of the victim-witness was not credible, did the Appellate Court properly decline to find that the appellant’s due process rights were violated?
“3. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the appellant failed to establish that he was fatally prejudiced by his trial counsel’s arguably deficient performance and therefore that he was not denied his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel?”