Webster Trust v. Roly, 782 A.2d 1253 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Webster Trust v. Roly, 782 A.2d 1253 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events (25 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Red 11, LLC v. Conservation Commission (connappct, 2009-10-20)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Red 11, LLC v. Conservation Commission
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pelliccione v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 64 Conn. App. 320, 331 , *651 780 A.2d 185 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 915 , 782 A.2d 1245 (2001) A farm pond falls within the § 22a-40 (a) (1) exemption only if the commission made the determination that it was essential to the farming activity.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mercer v. Rodriquez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Unified School District No. 1 v. Dept. of Education, 64 Conn. App. 273 , 780 A.2d 154 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 910 , 782 A.2d 1253 (2001); Gedney v. Board of Education, 47 Conn. App. 297 , 703 A.2d 804 (1997), cert. denied, 243 Conn. 968 , 707 A.2d 1268 (1998), respectively.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." 200 Associates, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see also · confidence low
A commission’s regulations must be reasonably precise in subject matter and reasonably adequate and sufficient to give both the commission and those affected by its decision notice of their rights and obligations.” (Citation omitted.) Sowin Associates v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 23 Conn. App. 370, 376 , 580 A.2d 91 , cert. denied, 216 Conn. 832 , 583 A.2d 131 (1990); see also Pelliccione v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 64 Conn. App. 320, 335 , 780 A.2d 185 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 915 , 782 A.2d 1245 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Raymond v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
“The language of the ordinance is construed so that no clause or provision is considered superfluous, void or insignificant.” Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Planning & Zoning Commission, supra, 46 Conn. App. 571 ; see also Pelliccione v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 64 Conn. App. 320, 336 , 780 A.2d 185 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 915 , 782 A.2d 1245 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WEBSTER TRUST
v.
RUSSELL C. ROLY, SR.
SC 16584.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2001.
782 A.2d 1253
Frederick P. Leaf, in support of the petition., Pasquale Young, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The petition for certification of the defendants, Gerald S. Adinolfi and Ruth A. Adinolfi, for appeal from the Appellate Court, 64 Conn. App. 233 (AC 20291), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the offer to purchase the land in question was a bona fide offer, so as to trigger the plaintiffs’ right of first refusal?”

SULLIVAN, C. J., and KATZ, VERTEFEUILLE and ZARELLA, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.