Segal v. Segal, 783 A.2d 1030 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Segal v. Segal, 783 A.2d 1030 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events (51 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Harvey (connappct, 2026-06-02)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Harvey
Conn. App. Ct. · 2026 · signal: see · confidence high
The claim is review- able under Golding because the claim is of constitutional magnitude alleging the violation of a fundamental right; see State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 671 , 781 A.2d 464 (“[i]f double jeopardy claims arising in the context of a single trial are raised for the first time on appeal, these claims are reviewable” (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001); and the record permits us to review the claim.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Walker
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Barber , 64 Conn. App. 659 , 671, 781 A.2d 464 ("[i]f double jeopardy claims arising in the context of a single trial are raised for the first time on appeal, these claims are reviewable" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Slaughter
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 667 , 781 A.2d 464 (‘‘[e]vi- dence demonstrating that the defendant was present in a known drug trafficking area further suggests an intent to sell’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Thompson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 670 , 781 A.2d 464 (“defendant may not pursue one course of action at trial for tactical reasons and later on appeal argue that the path he rejected should now be open to him” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001); see also State v. Paredes, 139 Conn. App. 135, 141-45 , 54 A.3d 1073 (2012) (claim that jury’s exposure to complainant’s statement to third party witness that defendant had raped her violated defendant’s constitutional right to fair trial was waived by defense counsel’s acquiescence…
cited Cited "see" State v. Martin
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 677 , 781 A.2d 464 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Sanchez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 666 , 781 A.2d 464 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Samuels
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Williams, 65 Conn. App. 449, 453 , 783 A.2d 53 (physician testifying that “delayed disclosure of sexual abuse by child victims was so common that it constituted the norm rather than the exception”), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 927 , 783 A.2d 1032 (2001); see also State v. Rolon, supra, 257 Conn. 156 ; State v. Christiano, 29 Conn. App. 642 , 617 A.2d 470 (1992), aff'd, 228 Conn. 456 , 637 A.2d 382 (1994).
cited Cited "see" State v. Lindo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 671 , 781 A.2d 464 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
cited Cited "see" State v. Jones
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 666 , 781 A.2d 464 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mattos
Conn. · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id.; see also State v. Williams, 65 Conn. App. 449 , 464–65, 783 A.2d 53 (constancy witness’ testimony that victim had disclosed that defendant subjected her ‘‘to oral and genital sexual abuse, and sexual abuse involving masturbation,’’ was consistent with Troupe because trial court had instructed jury to use testimony corroboratively and because ‘‘vari- ous counts alleged sexual abuse in the form of cunnilin- gus, fellatio, [vaginal penetration], and acts of masturbation’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 927 , 783 A.2d 1032 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Oscar H.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Chicano, 216 Conn. 699, 704 , 584 A.2d 425 (1990), overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Polanco, 308 Conn. 242 , 61 A.3d 1084 (2013); see also State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 671 , 781 A.2d 464 (‘‘[i]f double jeopardy claims arising in the context of a single trial are raised for the first time on appeal, these claims are reviewable’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Porfil
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Slaughter, 151 Conn. App. 340 , 349, 95 A.3d 1160 (detec- tives’ conclusions that defendant’s conduct was consis- tent with that of drug sellers were supported by testi- mony that neighborhood in which purported sales occurred was known to be high crime area in which drug sales took place), cert. denied, 314 Conn. 916 , 100 A.3d 405 (2014); see also State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 667 , 781 A.2d 464 (‘‘[e]vidence demonstrating that the defendant was present in a known drug trafficking area further suggests an intent to sell’’ [internal quota- tion marks omitted]), …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Porter
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Laws, 37 Conn.App. 276 , 289, 655 A.2d 1131 , cert. denied, 234 Conn. 907 , 659 A.2d 1210 (1995) ; see also State v. Barber, 64 Conn.App. 659 , 671, 781 A.2d 464 ("[i]f double jeopardy claims arising in the context of a single trial are raised for the first time on appeal, these claims are reviewable" [internal quotation marks omitted] ), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Holloway
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 675-76 , 781 A.2d 464 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Charles v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 675-76 , 781 A.2d 464 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Cotton
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Hill, 237 Conn. 81, 98-99 , 675 A.2d 866 (1996); State v. Tweedy, 219 Conn. 489 , 494 n.7, 594 A.2d 906 (1991); see also State v. Barber, 64 Conn. App. 659, 671 , 781 A.2d 464 (“[i]f double jeopardy claims arising in the context of a single trial are raised for the first time on appeal, these claims are reviewable”), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 925 , 783 A.2d 1030 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MOEY SEGAL
v.
LEONOR MIDVIDY SEGAL
SC 16604.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 10, 2001.
783 A.2d 1030
Brian McCormick, in support of the cross petition., William C. Franklin, in opposition.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

The defendant’s cross petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 17 (AC 19485), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the money judgment rendered in the defendant’s favor in Nevada is unenforceable in this state, despite the plaintiff debtor’s failure to comply with General Statutes § 52-606 (a), which requires proof that he has furnished security for the satisfaction of the Nevada judgment on appeal as required by Nevada law?”