Jones v. Comm'r of Corr., 796 A.2d 556 (Conn. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Jones v. Comm'r of Corr., 796 A.2d 556 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Lederle v. Spivey (connappct, 2009-03-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Lederle v. Spivey
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ford v. Ford, 68 Conn. App. 173, 187 , 789 A.2d 1104 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 910 , 796 A.2d 556 (2002).
discussed Cited "see" Sweeney v. Sweeney
Conn. · 2004 · signal: accord · confidence high
“Pendente lite orders necessarily cease to exist once a final judgment in the dispute has been rendered because their puipose is extinguished at that time.” Connolly v. Connolly, 191 Conn. 468, 480 , 464 A.2d 837 (1983); accord Ford v. Ford, 68 Conn. App. 173 , 181 n.3, 789 A.2d 1104 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 910 , 796 A.2d 556 (2002).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kennedy v. Kennedy
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Although an order modifying custody and visitation postdissolution is an appealable final judgment; see, e.g., Ford v. Ford, 68 Conn. App. 173, 181 , 789 A.2d 1104 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 910 , 796 A.2d 556 (2002); Kelly v. Kelly, 54 Conn. App. 50, 55-56 , 732 A.2d 808 (1999); in this case, the dispute over the modification of custody and visitation is ongoing, as motions to modify filed by the plaintiff have not yet been adjudicated. 16 In a dissolution action in which custody and visitation are at issue, the court may appoint counsel to represent a minor child to protect the best interest …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gina M. G. v. William C.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
The ultimate question on appellate review is whether the trial court could have concluded as it did.” (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Marlin v. Marlin, 73 Conn. App. 570, 573 , 808 A.2d 707 (2002); see also Ford v. Ford, 68 Conn. App. 173, 188 , 789 A.2d 1104 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 910 , 796 A.2d 556 (2002). “[W]e do not review the evidence to determine whether a conclusion different from the one reached could have been reached.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) McGinty v. McGinty, 66 Conn. App. 35, 40 , 783 A.2d 1170 (2001); Szczerkowski v. Karmelowicz, 60 Co…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MARVIN JONES
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 3, 2002.
796 A.2d 556
David B. Rozwaski, special public defender, in support of the petition., Linda N. Howe, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The petitioner Marvin Jones’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 68 Conn. App. 903 (AC 21883), is denied.