Malloy v. Town of Colchester, 863 A.2d 698 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Malloy v. Town of Colchester, 863 A.2d 698 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
77 citation events (77 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London (connappct, 2008-10-07) · Strongest negative: Munn v. Hotchkiss School (ctd, 2014-06-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Distinguished Munn v. Hotchkiss School (2×)
D. Conn. · 2014 · confidence high
Malloy v. Town of Colchester, 85 Conn.App. 627, 633-34 , 858 A.2d 813 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 907 , 863 A.2d 698 (2004) (explaining that in many cases "the question of legal causation is practically indistinguishable from an analysis of the extent of the tortfeasor’s duty to the plaintiff.” (citations and quotations omitted)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · confidence medium
Id., 718.
discussed Cited "see" Dunn v. Northeast Helicopters Flight Services, L.L.C.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
We decline to review that claim in light of our disposition of this appeal. ‘‘The concept of setoff allows [parties] that owe each other money to apply their mutual debts against each other, thus avoiding the absurdity of making A pay B when B in fact owes A.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, 84 Conn. App. 688, 703 , 854 A.2d 1100 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 905 , 863 A.2d 698 (2004); see id. (explaining that defendant will plead right of setoff ‘‘either to reduce the plaintiff’s recovery, or to defeat it…
discussed Cited "see" Pellet v. Keller Williams Realty Corp. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Malloy v. Colchester , 85 Conn.App. 627 , 632, 858 A.2d 813 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 907 , 863 A.2d 698 (2004), citing Arnone v. Enfield , 79 Conn.App. 501 , 505-506, 831 A.2d 260 , cert. denied, 266 Conn. 932 , 837 A.2d 804 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Lawrence v. Weiner
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: accord · confidence high
It is well established that ‘‘[i]n the absence of any disputed facts pertaining to jurisdiction, a court is not obligated to hold an evidentiary hearing before dismiss- ing an action for lack of jurisdiction.’’ (Internal quota- tion marks omitted.) Weihing v. Dodsworth, 100 Conn. App. 29, 39 , 917 A.2d 53 (2007); accord West Hartford v. Murtha Cullina, LLP, 85 Conn. App. 15, 25 , 857 A.2d 354 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 907 , 863 A.2d 700 (2004); Pinchbeck v. Dept. of Public Health, 65 Conn. App. 201, 209 , 782 A.2d 242 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 928 , 783 A.2d 1029 (2001); see also Weins…
discussed Cited "see" McDermott v. State (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Malloy v. Colchester, 85 Conn. App. 627, 634 , 858 A.2d 813 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 907 , 863 A.2d 698 (2004).
cited Cited "see" Valentin v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Batts v. Commissioner of Correction, 85 Conn. App. 723, 728 , 858 A.2d 856 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 907 , 863 A.2d 697 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" Gurguis v. Frankel (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Malloy v. Colchester, 85 Conn. App. 627, 633 , 858 A.2d 813 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 907 , 863 A.2d 698 (2004).
cited Cited "see" Zirinsky v. Zirinsky
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, 84 Conn. App. 688, 698 , 854 A.2d 1100 , cert, denied, 272 Conn. 905 , 863 A.2d 698 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sequeiro v. Torrington (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2026 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Malloy v. Colchester, 85 Conn. App. 627, 633 , 858 A.2d 813 (“[b]ecause actual causation, in theory, is virtually limitless, the legal construct of proximate cause serves to establish how far down the causal continuum tortfeasors will be held liable for the consequences of their actions” (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 907 , 863 A.2d 698 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cinotti v. Divers
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Whether to grant or to deny such motions clearly involves discre- tion, and a reviewing court should not disturb those decisions, unless there has been an abuse of that discre- tion, absent a showing that a specific constitutional right would be infringed.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Watrous v. Watrous, 108 Conn. App. 813 , 827– 28, 949 A.2d 557 (2008); see also West Hartford v. Mur- tha Cullina, LLP, 85 Conn. App. 15, 26 , 857 A.2d 354 (‘‘we review a [trial court’s] denial of a motion for a continuance to obtain discovery under an abuse of dis- cretion standard’’), c…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Crespo v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Batts v. Commissioner of Correction, 85 Conn. App. 723, 728 , 858 A.2d 856 (“[t]he court, in its role as finder of fact, [is] the sole arbiter of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to afford their testimony”), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 907 , 863 A.2d 697 (2004). 6 See footnote 2 of this opinion for the text of § 52-470 (b). 7 It is axiomatic that decisions of trial strategy and tactics rest with the attorney.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Weihing v. Dodsworth
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
This court has stated: “In the absence of any disputed facts pertaining to jurisdiction, a court is not obligated to hold an evidentiary hearing before dismissing an action for lack of jurisdiction.” Pinchbeck v. Dept. of Public Health, 65 Conn. App. 201, 209 , 782 A.2d 242 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 928 , 783 A.2d 1029 (2001); see also West Hartford v. Murtha Cullina, LLP, 85 Conn. App. 15, 25 , 857 A.2d 354 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 907 , 863 A.2d 700 (2004); Rosengarten v. Downes, 71 Conn. App. 372, 376 , 802 A.2d 170 , cert. granted on other grounds, 261 Conn. 936 , 806 A.2d 1066 (2002)…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. Charles
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Without the necessary factual and legal conclusions furnished by the trial court, either on its own or in response to a proper motion for articulation, any decision made by us . . . would be entirely speculative.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Silvermine Investors, LLC v. Call Center Technologies, Inc., 81 Conn. App. 701, 709-10 , 841 A.2d 695 (2004); see also Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters of Lloyd’s of London, 84 Conn. App. 688, 702 , 854 A.2d 1100 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 905 , 863 A.2d 698 (2004).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Alfano v. Randy's Wooster Street Pizza Shop II, Inc.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Mariculture Products Ltd. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London, 84 Conn. App. 688, 696 , 854 A.2d 1100 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 905 , 863 A.2d 698 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James M. MALLOY
v.
TOWN OF COLCHESTER et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 8, 2004.
863 A.2d 698
Published

William F. Gallagher and Mark A. Balaban, Middletown, in support of the petition.

Jay T. DonFrancisco, Hartford, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn.App. 627, 858 A.2d 813 (2004), is denied.