State v. Pelletier, 863 A.2d 703 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Pelletier, 863 A.2d 703 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events (28 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re Gabriella A. (conn, 2015-12-15)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" In re Gabriella A.
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Jorden R., supra, 293 Conn. 552–53. 12 See, e.g., In re Destiny D., 86 Conn. App. 77 , 79–80, 83–84, 859 A.2d 973 (mother erratically attended rehabilitative programs, resisted treatment recommendations, received positive drug tests, and refused to sign releases that would have allowed petitioner to make additional referrals), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 911 , 863 A.2d 702 (2004); In re Alexander T., supra, 81 Conn. App. 674 (mother failed to attend drug screenings and evaluations and did not visit her children for nine months); In re Ebony H., 68 Conn. App. 342, 346 , 789 A.2d 115…
cited Cited "see" Bloom v. Miklovich
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See George v. Watertown, 85 Conn. App. 606, 612 , 858 A.2d 800 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 911 , 863 A.2d 702 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Boyajian v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, e.g., id., 151, 157 (permitting collateral attack on condition to variance that contradicted ‘‘the strong and deeply rooted public policy in favor of the free and unrestricted alienability of property’’ and failed to serve ‘‘legal and useful purpose’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), with George v. Watertown, 85 Conn. App. 606 , 611–12, 858 A.2d 800 (prohibiting collateral attack on commission action that implicated strong public pol- icy interest but fell within ‘‘conformity [of] the law’’), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 911 , 863 A.2d 702 (2004), and Caltabia…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Quaranta v. King (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
In the absence of a showing that the [excluded] evidence would have affected the final result, its exclusion is harmless.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Lovetere v. Cole, 118 Conn. App. 680, 682 , 984 A.2d 1171 (2009); see Kalams v. Giacchetto, 268 Conn. 244, 249-50 , 842 A.2d 1100 (2004); see also State v. Pelletier, 85 Conn. App. 71, 79 , 856 A.2d 435 , cert. denied, 272 Conn. 911 , 863 A.2d 703 (2004); L’Homme v. Dept. of Transportation, 72 Conn. App. 64, 71 , 805 A.2d 728 (2002); In re Anna B., 50 Conn. App. 298, 305-306 , 717 A.2d 289 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bingham v. Department of Public Works
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., George v. Watertown, 85 Conn. App. 606, 613 , 858 A.2d 800 (holding that the plaintiffs action for declaratory judgment as to the constitutionality of a subdivision regulation was ripe, although the plaintiff did not have an application pending and the planning and zoning commission was not presently attempting to enforce the challenged regulation against him, where the commission had enforced the regulation in the past, and thus was likely to do so in the future), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 911 , 863 A.2d 702 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Nicole PELLETIER.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 20, 2004.
863 A.2d 703
Published

James B. Streeto, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Christopher T. Godialis, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn.App. 71, 856 A.2d 435 (2004), is denied.