green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.8 score
“the mazza decision, with its countless references to a psychiatrist's special duty, does not extend to general practitioners.”
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Thierfelder v. Wolfert
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
the mazza decision, with its countless references to a psychiatrist's special duty, does not extend to general practitioners.
discussed
Cited "see"
Silver v. Pinskey
See Long v. Ostroff, 854 A.2d 524 , (Pa.Super.2004), appeal denied, 582 Pa. 700 , 871 A.2d 192 (2005) (holding statement of questions involved exceeded one page and appellant failed to comply with other Rules of Appellate Procedure; appellant was not sanctioned because violations did not impede appellate review); Commonwealth v. Stafford, 749 A.2d 489 (Pa.Super.2000), appeal denied, 568 Pa. 660 , 795 A.2d 975 (2000) (stating this Court had power to sanction appellant who filed five-page statement of questions involved; declining to do so "in the interest of justice.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
D. Anderson v. North Star SD
See, e.g., Kane v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co., 841 A.2d 1038, 1051 (Pa. Super. 2003), appeal denied, 871 A.2d 192 (Pa. 2005) (“At any rate, this ambiguity convinces us that it was error for the trial court to dismiss the breach of contract claim against Erie at this early preliminary objection stage of the litigation.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Winschel v. Jain
(2×)
See, e.g., Long v. Ostroff, 854 A.2d 524, 528 (Pa.Super.2004), appeal denied, 582 Pa. 700 , 871 A.2d 192 (2005) (holding as a matter of law that a general practitioner’s duty of care does not prohibit an extramarital affair with a patient’s spouse). ¶ 38 Duty is measured against the standard of care appropriate to the training of the physician and the time and place of the treatment.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HOLZ
v.
HOLZ
v.
HOLZ
321 EAL (2004).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 15, 2005.
871 A.2d 192
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (1)
Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal denied.