green
Positive treatment
10.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006
2016
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Paulo T.
A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when there is no evidence in the record to support it . . . or when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 792–93; see generally In re Patricia C., 93 Conn. App. 25 , 32–33, 887 A.2d 929 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 931 , 896 A.2d 101 (2006).16 A The respondent first argues the court failed to identify all of the factors that led to the petitioner’s removal.
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Paulo T.
A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when there is no evidence in the record to support it . . . or when although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 792–93; see generally In re Patricia C., 93 Conn. App. 25 , 32–33, 887 A.2d 929 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 931 , 896 A.2d 101 (2006).16 A The respondent first argues the court failed to identify all of the factors that led to the petitioner’s removal.
cited
Cited "see"
Bell v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Bell, 93 Conn. App. 650, 652 , 891 A.2d 9 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 933 , 896 A.2d 101 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
Bell v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Bell , 93 Conn. App. 650 , 652, 891 A.2d 9 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 933 , 896 A.2d 101 (2006).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cornelius v. Rosario
(2×)
See State v. Barrett, 205 Conn. 437, 455 , 534 A.2d 219 (1987).” Pasiakos v. BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc., 93 Conn. App. 641, 645 , 889 A.2d 916 , cert. denied, 277 Conn. 929 , 896 A.2d 101 (2006).
examined
Cited "see"
Zollo v. Commissioner of Correction
(4×)
Moreover, given the question posed by the assistant state’s attorney about a purported eighteen year plea offer midtrial in the first habeas trial, the petitioner failed to take advantage of the remedies available under such circumstances, e.g., (1) request a continuance to investigate the purported plea offer; see Pasiakos v. BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc., 93 Conn. App. 641, 645 , 889 A.2d 916 (absent request for continuance, court reasonably could assume plaintiff satisfied with proceeding with trial), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 929 , 896 A.2d 101 (2006); (2) request permission to amend his fir…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Trice
He need only represent by his words or conduct that he is so armed.’’ (Emphasis in original; footnote added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 229–30; see also State v. Bell, 93 Conn. App. 650 , 670–71, 891 A.2d 9 (defendant held object under jacket that ‘‘ ‘looked like a gun’ ’’), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 933 , 896 A.2d 101 (2006); State v. Ingram, 43 Conn. App. 801, 807 , 687 A.2d 1279 (1996) (toy gun seized from defendant’s apartment was similar to that displayed during robbery), cert. denied, 240 Conn. 908 , 689 A.2d 472 (1997); State v. Arena, 33 Conn. App. 468,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Hall-George
He need only represent by his words or conduct that he is so armed.’’ (Emphasis in original.) State v. Hawthorne, supra, 573 ; see also State v. Bell, 93 Conn. App. 650, 670 , 891 A.2d 9 (quoting same language from Hawthorne), cert. denied, 277 Conn. 933 , 896 A.2d 101 (2006).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fred Ruotolo Et Al.
v.
Riefe Tietjen, Executor (Estate of John N. Swanson), Et Al.
v.
Riefe Tietjen, Executor (Estate of John N. Swanson), Et Al.
SC 17640.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 31, 2006.
Jeffrey T. Beatty and J. Michael Sulzbach, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The petition by the defendants Riefe Tietjen, executor of the estate of John N. Swanson, Marion Fessenden and Geraldine Augeri, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 93 Conn. App. 432 (AC 25239), is granted, limited to the following issue:
[*930] The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17640. Jeffrey T. Beatty and J. Michael Sulzbach, in support of the petition. Decided March 31, 2006“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 45a-441 is applicable to the facts of the present case?”