Double C Constr. Co. v. Advanced Home Builders, LLC, 969 A.2d 171 (Conn. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Double C Constr. Co. v. Advanced Home Builders, LLC, 969 A.2d 171 (Conn. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events (40 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Estrella J.C. (connappct, 2016-10-18)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Estrella J.C.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Donald M ., 113 Conn.App. 63 , 71, 966 A.2d 266 (forensic interview statements admissible under medical diagnosis and treatment exception because the purpose of the interview was, at least in part , to determine whether the victim was in need of medical treatment [emphasis added] ), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 910 , 969 A.2d 174 (2009).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Griswold
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Donald M., 113 Conn. App. 63, 71 , 966 A.2d 266 (forensic inter- view statements admissible under medical diagnosis and treatment exception because ‘‘the purpose of the interview was, at least in part, to determine whether the victim was in need of medical treatment’’ [emphasis added]), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 910 , 969 A.2d 174 (2009).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Freddy T.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
The medical diagnosis and treatment exception to the hear- say rule is codified in § 8-3 (5) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence: ‘‘A statement made for purposes of obtaining a medical diagnosis or treatment and describ- ing medical history, or past or present symptoms, pain, or sensations, or the inception or general character of the cause or external source thereof, insofar as reason- ably pertinent to the medical diagnosis or treatment.’’ Admissibility of such statements turns on whether ‘‘the declarant was seeking medical diagnosis or treatment, and the statements are reasonab…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Ezequiel R.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Griswold , supra, 160 Conn. App. at 552-53, 557 , 127 A.3d 189 ; see also State v. Donald M. , 113 Conn. App. 63 , 71, 966 A.2d 266 (forensic interview statements admissible under medical diagnosis and treatment exception because purpose of interview was, at least in part, to determine whether victim was in need of medical treatment), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 910 , 969 A.2d 174 (2009).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Diaz v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Mejia v. Commissioner of Correction, 98 Conn. App. 180 , 908 A.2d 581 (2006), appeal dismissed after remand, 112 Conn. App. 137 , 962 A.2d 148 , cert. denied, 291 Conn. 910 , 969 A.2d 171 (2009).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Double C Construction Company, LLC
v.
Advanced Home Builders, LLC, Et Al.
SC 18337.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 8, 2009.
969 A.2d 171
William F. Gallagher, in support of the petition.
Published

The petition by the defendants Advanced Home Builders, LLC, Creative Building Corporation, Robert Chiulli and Laura Chiulli for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court (AC 30409) is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly dismiss the defendants’ appeal for lack of a final judgment?”