State v. Nixon, 635 A.2d 1229 (Conn. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Nixon, 635 A.2d 1229 (Conn. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
57 citation events (16 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Vanicky v. Vanicky (connappct, 2011-04-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Vanicky v. Vanicky (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cook v. Bieluch, 32 Conn. App. 537, 545-47 , 629 A.2d 1175 , cert. denied, 228 Conn. 910 , 635 A.2d 1229 (1993).
cited Cited "see" Cook v. Bieluch, No. Fa89 026 08 73 S (Aug. 29, 1995)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cook v. Bieluch, 228 Conn. 910 , ___ A.2d ___ (1993).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." American Mortgage Corp. v. Hope (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
The plaintiff last claims that the trial court improperly denied additional attorney’s fees for the bankruptcy and debt determination proceedings. “ ‘Whether to allow [attorney’s] fees and in what amount calls for the exercise of judicial discretion.’ ” Clement v. Clement, 34 Conn. App. 641, 649 , 643 A.2d 874 (1994); see also Cook v. Bieluch, 32 Conn. App. 537, 544 , 629 A.2d 1175 , cert. denied, 228 Conn. 910 , 635 A.2d 1229 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Irving Nixon
SC 14866.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 16, 1993.
635 A.2d 1229
Timothy H. Everett, in support of the petition., James M. Ralls, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 32 Conn. App. 224 (AC 11201), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Under the circumstances of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s convictions, as an accessory, of assault in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-60 (a) (5) and of assault on a correctional officer in violation of General Statutes § 53a-167c (a) (1) did not violate the defendant’s federal double jeopardy rights?”