green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Doe v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
See Sanborn v. Greenwald, 39 Conn. App. 289, 300 , 664 A.2d 803 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995); see also Lombard v. Edward J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Neuhaus v. DeCholnoky
See Sanborn v. Greenwald, 39 Conn. App. 289, 305 , 664 A.2d 803 (§ 52-584 “reflects a policy of law, as declared by the legislature, that after a given length of time a [defendant] should be sheltered from liability and furthers the public policy of allowing people, after the lapse of a reasonable time, to plan their affairs with a degree of certainty, free from the disruptive burden of protracted and unknown potential liability” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Rosenfield v. Rogin, Nassau, Caplan, Lassman & Hirtle, LLC
See Sanborn v. Greenwald, 39 Conn. App. 289, 301-302 , 664 A.2d 803 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Nosik v. Mastronardi, No. Cv00 37 90 88 S (Mar. 11, 2002)
See Sanborn v. Greenwald, 39 Conn. App. 289 , 297 , 664 A.2d 803 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Home Loan Investment Bank v. Sebjan, No. Cv97 032 96 03 S (Jul. 24, 2000)
"The continuing course of conduct doctrine reflects the policy that, during an ongoing relationship, lawsuits are premature because specific tortious acts or omissions may be difficult to identify and may yet be remedied." Blanchette v. Barrett , supra, 229 Conn. 276 ; see Sanborn v. Greenwald , 39 Conn. App. 289 , 295 , 664 A.2d 803 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995). "[A] precondition for the operation of the continuing course of conduct doctrine is that the defendant must have committed an initial wrong upon the plaintiff." Sherwood v. Danbury Hospital , supra, 204.
cited
Cited "see"
Rosenfield v. Rogin, No. Cv 97 0568522 (Apr. 12, 2000)
See Sanborn v. Greenwald, 39 Conn. App. 289 , 301 , 664 A.2d 803 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Antonios v. Farmers Ins. Exchange, No. Cv93-0117917s (Apr. 2, 1998)
See Chapman v. Norfolk Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance Co. , 39 Conn. App. 306 , 330-33 , 665 A.2d 112 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1185 (1995); Practice Book § 177.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Courchesne
(2×)
E.g., State v. Griffin, 251 Conn. 671, 692-94 , 741 A.2d 913 (1999) (setting forth common-law rights with respect to jury trials as enumerated by Swift); Binette v. Sabo, 244 Conn. 23, 78 , 710 A.2d 688 (1998) ( Katz, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (relying on Swift to establish importance of individual rights, including right to be free from abuse of governmental power, during preconstitutional era); Weidenbacher v. Duclos, 234 Conn. 51, 60-61 , 661 A.2d 988 (1995) (relying on Swift in concluding that writ of habeas corpus is proper procedural vehicle with which to challenge c…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Decorso v. Watchtower Bible, No. Cv 98 145296 (Mar. 10, 2000)
Thus, the three year limitation period of § 52-577 applies to all actions based on a tort unless there has *394 been a specific statutory exclusion.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Rubin, 209 Conn. 437, 441 , 551 A.2d 1220 (1988); see, e.g., Sanborn v. Greenwald, 39 Conn. App. 289, 301 , 664 A.2d 803 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995) (noting that actions for legal malpractice based on negligence are subject to § 52-577).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Decorso v. Watchtower Bible and Tract Society
See, e.g., Sanborn v. Greenwald , 39 Conn. App. 289 , 301 , 664 A.2d 803 , cert. denied, 235 Conn. 925 , 666 A.2d 1186 (1995) (noting that actions for legal malpractice based on negligence are subject to § 52-577 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SUZANNE SANBORN
v.
CHARLES GREENWALD
v.
CHARLES GREENWALD
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 27, 1995.
Gerald S. Sack and Michael B. Pollack, in support of the petition., Robyn L. Sondak, in opposition.
Published
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 39 Conn. App. 289 (AC 13372), is denied.