Sec. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Kings West Ltd. P'ship, 746 A.2d 789 (Conn. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
Sec. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Kings West Ltd. P'ship, 746 A.2d 789 (Conn. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
51 citation events (47 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nation Electrical Contracting, LLC v. St. Dimitrie Romanian Orthodox Church (connappct, 2013-08-13)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Nation Electrical Contracting, LLC v. St. Dimitrie Romanian Orthodox Church
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Paulus v. LaSala, 56 Conn. App. 139, 148 , 742 A.2d 379 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 928 , 746 A.2d 789 (2000). “[T]here is no right to recover interest in a civil action unless a statute provides for interest. ” Foley v. Huntington Co., 42 Conn. App. 712, 737 , 682 A.2d 1026 , cert. denied, 239 Conn. 931 , 683 A.2d 397 (1996).
discussed Cited "see" Travelers Property & Casualty Co. v. Christie (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
III Next, we address the defendant’s argument that, even if the court was correct in finding that D’Amore’s fee was reasonable, the court improperly awarded D’Amore prejudgment interest pursuant to § 37-3a. 12 The traditional rule applicable to this issue is that “[w]here articles are delivered or services performed, and charged on book, and no time of payment agreed on . . . interest would be char geable on such accounts if unreasonably delayed . . . .” Selleck v. French, 1 Conn. 32, 34 , (1814); see Paulus v. LaSala, 56 Conn. App. 139, 147-48 , 742 A.2d 379 (1999) (tracing devel…
discussed Cited "see" Hudson United Bank v. Cinnamon Ridge Corp.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Paulus v. LaSala, 56 Conn. App. 139, 153 , 742 A.2d 379 (1999) (“[e]ven if, as the plaintiffs claim, the defendants breached a contract, such a breach is not sufficient to establish a CUTPA violation”), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 928 , 746 A.2d 789 (2000); Calandro v. Allstate Ins.
discussed Cited "see" Flynn v. Kaumeyer
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
Because this claim affects the amount of the judgment for the purposes of the calculation of the § 52-192a interest; See Paulus v. LaSala, 56 Conn. App. 139, 149-51 , 742 A.2d 379 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 928 , 746 A.2d 789 (2000); we discuss this claim first.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Dixon v. United Illuminating Co.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See McDonough v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co., 204 Conn. 104, 118 , 527 A.2d 664 (1987); see also Besade v. Interstate Security Services, 212 Conn. 441, 449 , 562 A.2d 1086 (1989). “[T]he test for determining whether particular conduct is a proximate cause of an injury [is] whether it was a substantial factor in producing the result.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Paternostro v. Arborio Corp., 56 Conn. App. 215, 222 , 742 A.2d 409 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 928 , 746 A.2d 788 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SECURITY MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
v.
KINGS WEST LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 10, 2000.
746 A.2d 789
Edward T. Krumeich, in support of the petition., Bernard Green, in opposition.
Published

The petition by the receiver CB CommerciaJ/Hamp-shire, LLC, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 44 (AC 18899), is denied.

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Edward T. Krumeich, in support of the petition. Bernard Green, in opposition. Decided February 10, 2000