State v. Mills, 754 A.2d 163 (Conn. 2000). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Mills, 754 A.2d 163 (Conn. 2000). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (40 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Francione (connappct, 2012-06-19) · Strongest negative: State v. Aponte (connappct, 2001-10-23)
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" State v. Aponte
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see State v. Mills, 57 Conn. App. 202, 210-13 , 748 A.2d 318 (due process violation where prosecutor repeatedly told jury it must convict defendant so evil would not triumph by its inaction and victim would not be victimized twice), cert. denied, 253 Conn. 914 , 915, 754 A.2d 163 (2000); State v. Butler, 55 Conn. App. 502, 519 , 739 A.2d 732 (1999) (due process violation where prosecutor referred to inadmissible evidence during closing argument), aff'd, 255 Conn. 828 , 769 A.2d 697 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Francione
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Mills, 57 Conn. App. 202 , 207 n.10, 208, 748 A.2d 318 (comment that “justice in this case requires a murder conviction” was improper expression of opinion [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 253 Conn. 914 , 915, 754 A.2d 163 (2000).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Smith
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
We previously have upheld similar instructions that were challenged as not being “evenhanded.” See, e.g., States v. Scarpiello, 40 Conn. App. 189, 201 , 670 A.2d 856 , cert, denied, 236 Conn. 921 , 674 A.2d 1327 (1996); State v. Colon, 37 Conn. App. 635, 640 , 657 A.2d 247 (1994), cert, denied, 234 Conn. 911 , 660 A.2d 354 (1995); State v. Brown, 35 Conn. App. 699, 713-14 , 647 A.2d 17 , cert denied, 231 Conn. 932 , 649 A.2d 254 (1994); see also State v. Williams, supra, 220 Conn. 385 . “[I]n the absence of a fair indication to the contrary, [the jury] is presumed to have followed the in…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
RICARDO MILLS
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 25, 2000.
754 A.2d 163
Harry Weller, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition., Elizabeth M. Inkster, assistant public defender, in opposition.
Published

The petition of the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 57 Conn. App. 202 (AC 17986), is denied.

MCDONALD, C. J., and VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Harry Weller, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Elizabeth M. Inkster, assistant public defender, in opposition. Decided May 25, 2000