green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Diaz v. Commissioner of Correction
See Adorno v. Commissioner of Correction, 66 Conn. App. 179 , 195 n.7, 783 A.2d 1202 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 943 , 786 A.2d 428 (2001); see also State v. Tillman, 220 Conn. 487, 505 , 600 A.2d 738 (1991), cert. denied, 505 U.S. 1207 , 112 S. Ct. 3000 , 120 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Eastwood v. Commissioner of Correction
Regarding Blanchard’s testimony that trial counsel should have utilized an expert witness to distinguish dreams and fantasies from motive and intent, “[t]he failure of defense counsel to call a potential defense witness does not constitute ineffective assistance unless there is some showing that the testimony would have been helpful in establishing the asserted defense.” State v. Taiton, 197 Conn. 280, 297 , 497 A.2d 35 (1985); see Adorno v. Commissioner of Correction, 66 Conn. App. 179, 186 , 783 A.2d 1202 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 943 , 786 A.2d 428 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Felix
(2×)
See State v. Dillard, 66 Conn. App. 238 , 250-51 n. 13-14, 784 A.2d 387 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 943 , 786 A.2d 431 (2001). 11 The prosecutor’s statements at issue here were not improper.
cited
Cited "see"
Lambert v. Commissioner of Correction
See Adorno v. Commissioner of Correction, 66 Conn. App. 179, 186 , 783 A.2d 1202 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 943 , 786 A.2d 428 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cunningham v. Planning & Zoning Commission
(2×)
Because the conservation plan was not in evidence before the trial court when it rendered its judgment dismissing the appeal, and we do not take new evidence at this level of appeal; see State v. Dillard, 66 Conn. App. 238 , 248 n.11, 784 A.2d 387 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 943 , 786 A.2d 431 (2001); we grant the defendants’ motion to strike.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rizzo
(4×)
See, e.g., State v. Dillard, 66 Conn.App. 238 , 248 n. 11, 784 A.2d 387 (that information was not before the trial court, and, on appeal, we do not take new evidence), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 943 , 786 A.2d 431 (2001); C.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ovechka
(4×)
See, e.g., State v. Dillard, 66 Conn. App. 238 , 248 n.11, 784 A.2d 387 (“that information was not before the trial court, and, on appeal, we do not take new evidence”), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 943 , 786 A.2d 431 (2001); C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ortiz
(2×)
Any prejudice resulting from the testimony of the pleas was rendered harmless when the guilt of the accomplices was established by their own testimony which also implicated the defendant.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 349 ; see also State v. Dillard, 66 Conn. App. 238, 244 , 784 A.2d 387 (following Just and concluding reversal not required when “evidence of the codefendants’ pleas of guilty came from the witnesses’ own testimony and was inextricably linked with their testimony and other evidence regarding the circumstances surrounding the robbery”), cer…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowden v. Commissioner of Correction
See King v. Commissioner of Correction, 73 Conn. App. 600, 603 , 808 A.2d 1166 (2002), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 931 , 815 A.2d 133 (2003); see also Carey v. Commissioner of Correction, 86 Conn. App. 180 , 185 n.6, 860 A.2d 776 (2004), cert. denied, 272 Conn. 915 , 866 A.2d 1283 (2005). 7 Similarly, in Adorno v. Commissioner of Correction, 66 Conn. App. 179 , 188 n.3, 783 A.2d 1202 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 943 , 786 A.2d 428 (2001), we stated that “[t]he habeas court, however, did not discuss in detail those claims, some of which were not even mentioned in the petition for habeas corpus.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
JAMES DILLARD
v.
JAMES DILLARD
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 27, 2001.
Felix Esposito, special public defender, in support of the petition., Michael E. O’Hare, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 25 opinions | Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 238 (AC 20384), is denied.
Michael E. O’Hare, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided November 27, 2001