Ramos v. Ramos, 840 A.2d 1175 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Ramos v. Ramos, 840 A.2d 1175 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Wolyniec v. Wolyniec (connappct, 2019-02-26)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Wolyniec v. Wolyniec
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carasso v. Carasso , 80 Conn. App. 299 , 310-11, 834 A.2d 793 (2003) (noting different aspects of alimony obligations, including money payments and obligations to provide insurance), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 913 , 840 A.2d 1174 (2004).
discussed Cited "see" State v. MAKEE R.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smith v. Andrews, 289 Conn. 61, 79 , 959 A.2d 597 (2008). 10 See State v. Vargas, 80 Conn. App. 454, 462 , 835 A.2d 503 (2003) (“[c]entrai to a defendant’s right to a fair trial is the right to have issues of fact and credibility decided by the jury”), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 913 , 840 A.2d 1175 (2004). 11 In the present case, the defendant had ample opportunity to object to both the preliminary and the final instructions.
cited Cited "see" Chyung v. Chi Han Chyung
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carasso v. Carasso, *675 80 Conn. App. 299, 309 , 834 A.2d 793 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 913 , 840 A.2d 1174 (2004).
cited Cited "see" State v. Izzo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Vargas, 80 Conn. App. 454, 468 , 835 A.2d 503 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 913 , 840 A.2d 1175 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." McNamara v. McNamara
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
See generally State v. Jackson, 334 Conn. 793, 816, 821 , 224 A.3d 886 (2020) (trial court abused its discretion in failing to afford defendant reasonable continuance to obtain his own expert to counter late disclosure of expert by state, which deprived defendant of meaning- ful opportunity to challenge state’s expert); see also Ramos v. Ramos, 80 Conn. App. 276 , 284–85, 835 A.2d 62 (2003) (trial court abused its discretion in denying motion for continuance to address late disclosure of plaintiff’s health condition, and court’s decision was harmful when defendant was denied opportunit…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. DeJesus
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see also · confidence low
“While we are mindful that the defendant’s task to lay a foundation as to the likely relevance of records to which he is not privy is not an easy one, we are also mindful of the witness’ legitimate interest in maintaining, to the extent possible, the privacy of her confidential records.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Walsh, 52 Conn. App. 708, 722 , 728 A.2d 15 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 911 , 733 A.2d 233 (1999); see also State v. Vargas, 80 Conn. App. 454, 469-70 , 835 A.2d 503 (2003), cert. denied, 267 Conn. 913 , 840 A.2d 1175 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
REYNALDO RAMOS
v.
BENITO RAMOS, JR.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jan 13, 2004.
840 A.2d 1175
Hugh D. Hughes, William F. Gallagher, Brian M. Flood and Garrett Moore, in support of the petition., William J. Melley III, in opposition.
Published

The petition by the plaintiff Wilson Ramirez for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 276 (AC 23455), is denied.

[*914] Decided January 13, 2004 Hugh D. Hughes, William F. Gallagher, Brian M. Flood and Garrett Moore, in support of the petition. William J. Melley III, in opposition.