State v. Brisco, 861 A.2d 1178 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Brisco, 861 A.2d 1178 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (14 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: N. R. v. M. P. (connappct, 2024-09-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." N. R. v. M. P.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id., 431–32.17 Our 17 Those factors include: ‘‘[E]ach parent’s reasons for seeking or opposing the move, the quality of the relationships between the child and the custodial and noncustodial parents, the impact of the move on the quantity and quality of the child’s future contact with the noncustodial parent, the degree to which the custodial parent’s and child’s life may be enhanced economically, emotionally and educationally by the move, and the feasibility of preserving the relationship between the noncustodial parent and child through suitable visitation arrangements. . . . […
STATE of Connecticut
v.
John W. BRISCO.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 10, 2004.
861 A.2d 1178
Published

Conrad Ost Seifert, Old Lyme, in support of the petition.

Julia K. Conlin, deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 84 Conn.App. 120, 852 A.2d 746 (2004), is denied.