State v. Aloi, 867 A.2d 840 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Aloi, 867 A.2d 840 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
55 citation events (55 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sosin v. Sosin (conn, 2011-02-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Sosin v. Sosin
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Smithfield Associates, LLC v. Tolland Bank, 86 Conn. App. 14, 26 , 860 A.2d 738 (2004) (“an award of . . . interest [pursuant to § 37-3a] is discretionary . . . rather than automatic” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 901 , 867 A.2d 839 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Morales (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Gaston, 86 Conn. App. 218, 229 , 860 A.2d 1253 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 901 , 867 A.2d 840 (2005).
examined Cited "see" State v. Silva (4×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Aloi, 86 Conn.App. 363, 370-71 , 861 A.2d 1180 (2004), cert. granted, 273 Conn. 901 , 867 A.2d 840 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rissolo v. Betts Island Oyster Farms, LLC
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Flynn v. Kaumeyer, 67 Conn. App. 100, 105 , 787 A.2d 37 (2001) (“[a]n award of § 37-3a interest is discretionary”); see also Smithfield Associates, LLC v. Tolland Bank, 86 Conn. App. 14, 26 , 860 A.2d 738 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 901 , 867 A.2d 839 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Santana v. City of Hartford
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
Because the relevant contract language is ambiguous, “[t]he determination of the intent of the parties to a contract ... is a question of fact subject to review under the clearly erroneous standard.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)Rund v. Melillo, 63 Conn. App. 216, 221 , 772 A.2d 774 (2001); see also Smithfield Associates, LLC v. Tolland Bank, 86 Conn. App. 14, 18 , 860 A.2d 738 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 901 , 867 A.2d 839 (2005); Larson v. Jacobson, 38 Conn. App. 186, 189 , 659 A.2d 753 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Paul Aloi
SC 17350.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 1, 2005.
867 A.2d 840
Christopher T. Godialis, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition., Glenn T. Terk and P. Jo Anne Burgh, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn. App. 363 (AC 24641), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly construe and apply General Statutes § 53a-167a?”

[*902] Christopher T. Godialis, assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Glenn T. Terk and P. Jo Anne Burgh, in opposition. Decided February 1, 2005