Rubel v. Wainwright, 871 A.2d 1028 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Rubel v. Wainwright, 871 A.2d 1028 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events (49 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Devin M. (connappct, 2024-11-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Devin M. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rubel v. Wainwright, 86 Conn. App. 728, 741 , 862 A.2d 863 (‘‘[r]ecklessness . . . is more than negligence and also is more than gross negligence’’), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 919 , 871 A.2d 1028 (2005); see also State v. Gray, supra, 212 Conn. App. 214–15 (finding third Asherman factor weighed against state even though record did not reflect animus or improper motive, because police department’s policy violating state law ‘‘constituted a reckless disregard of the defendant’s rights’’).
cited Cited "see" State v. Coltherst
Conn. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Col- therst, 87 Conn. App. 93 , 95–98, 864 A.2d 869 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 919 , 871 A.2d 371 (2005).
cited Cited "see" State v. Coltherst
Conn. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Col- therst, 87 Conn. App. 93 , 95–98, 864 A.2d 869 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 919 , 871 A.2d 371 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Lanier
Conn. App. Ct. · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Coltherst, 87 Conn. App. 93 , 109 n.11, 110, 864 A.2d 869 (concluding that any error was harmless when court’s jury charge included essential elements of larceny but failed to define one of those elements), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 919 , 871 A.2d 371 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Rupar
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Rupar, 86 Conn. App. 641, 642 , 862 A.2d 352 (2004), cert. denied, 273 Conn. 919 , 871 A.2d 1030 (2005). 4 In accordance with our policy of protecting the privacy interests of victims of sexual abuse, we decline to identify the victim or others through whom her identify may be ascertained.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Stavrakis (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
The pertinent test is whether the charge, read in its entirety, fairly presents the case to the jury in such a way that injustice is not done to either party under the established rules of law.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Peeler, 271 Conn. 338, 360 , 857 A.2d 808 (2004); see, e.g., Rubel v. Wainwright, 86 Conn. App. 728, 734-35 , 862 A.2d 863 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 919 , 871 A.2d 1028 (2005).
Abraham RUBEL
v.
Eleanor P. WAINWRIGHT et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 31, 2005.
871 A.2d 1028
Published

Cynthia I. Crockett, Rocky Hill, in support of the petition.

Barbara A. Frederick and Kerry R. Callahan, Hartford, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 86 Conn.App. 728, 862 A.2d 863 (2005), is denied.