State v. Bowens, 988 A.2d 878 (Conn. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Bowens, 988 A.2d 878 (Conn. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
48 citation events (48 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Rhodes (conn, 2020-10-13)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Rhodes (2×)
Conn. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See footnote 1 of this opinion. ‘‘[When] the defendant is not in exclusive pos- session of the premises where the [contraband is] found, it may not be inferred that [the defendant] knew of the presence of the [contraband] and had control of [it], unless there are other incriminating statements or circumstances tending to buttress such an inference.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Johnson, 316 Conn. 45 , 58, 111 A.3d 436 (2015). ‘‘Accordingly, [t]o mitigate the possibility that innocent persons might be prosecuted for possessory offenses . . . it is essen- tial that t…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Winfrey (2×)
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bowens, 118 Conn. App. 112, 123 , 982 A.2d 1089 (2009) (“the defendant was driving the [car] containing the revolver, which itself suggests control of the firearm”), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 902 , 988 A.2d 878 (2010); State v. Sanchez, 75 Conn. App. 223, 242-43 , 815 A.2d 242 (similar), cert. denied, 263 Conn. 914 , 821 A.2d 769 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Butler (2×)
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bowens, 118 Conn. App. 112, 129 , 982 A.2d 1089 (2009) (evasive action “manifested an intent to exercise dominion and control over the contraband”), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 902 , 988 A.2d 878 (2010); State v. Smith, 94 Conn. App. 188, 194 , 891 A.2d 974 (observation of defendant reaching toward floor of vehicle where police later found bags of crack cocaine relevant to establishing possession), cert. denied, 278 Conn. 906 , 897 A.2d 100 (2006).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jones (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Bowens, 118 Conn. App. 112, 121 , 982 A.2d 1089 (2009) (‘‘[t]ypically, the state will proceed under a theory of constructive possession when the [contraband is] not found on the defendant’s person at the time of arrest, but the accused still exer- cises dominion [or] control’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 902 , 988 A.2d 878 (2010).
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Robert W. BOWENS.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 9, 2010.
988 A.2d 878
Published

David B. Rozwaski, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Richard K. Greenalch, Jr., special deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn.App. 112, 982 A.2d 1089 (2009), is denied.