Decorso v. Calderaro, 991 A.2d 564 (Conn. 2010).

Decorso v. Calderaro, 991 A.2d 564 (Conn. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment published 5.6 score

20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.

Strongest positive: Eubanks v. Comm'r of Corr., 140 A.3d 402 (Conn. App. Ct. 2016)

Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of

2010 2018 2026

How cited ↗

Cited for

Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record

Eubanks v. Comm'r of Corr., 140 A.3d 402 (Conn. App. Ct. 2016).published
Blumberg Assocs. Worldwide, Inc. v. Brown & Brown of Connecticut, Inc., 30 A.3d 38 (Conn. App. Ct. 2011).published 2 cites
Lavette v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., 278 A.3d 1072 (Conn. App. Ct. 2022).published 2 cites

Treatment classes

Mentioned in passing 15

Cited "see" 3

Cited "see, e.g." 2

Treatment by court

connappct		0R/0Y/5G	19
conn		0R/0Y/0G	1

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…

Gail Decorso
v.
Jamal Calderaro Et Al.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Mar 30, 2010.

Published opinion

991 A.2d 564

2010 Conn. LEXIS 127

Google Scholar ↗ | CourtListener ↗

Gail DeCorso, pro se, in support of the petition., Laura Pascale Zaino and Alfred J. Zullo, in opposition.

McLachlan.

Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 118 Conn. App. 617 (AC 30353), is denied.

[*920] Gail DeCorso, pro se, in support of the petition. Laura Pascale Zaino and Alfred J. Zullo, in opposition. Decided March 30, 2010

McLACHLAN, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Your account