green
Positive treatment
2.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Leach Corp. v. Commissioner
C. 31 , 33 , affirmed 192 F. 2d 392 *198 (C.
cited
Cited "see"
Pumi-Blok Co. v. Commissioner
See Isidor Dobkin, supra, 5 T.C. at 33, affirmed per curiam 192 F. 2d 392 (CA-2); Charter Wire, Inc. v. United States, 309 F. 2d 878 , 880 (CA-7), certiorari denied 372 U.S. 965 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Santa Anita Consol., Inc. v. Commissioner
(2×)
See Isidor Dobkin , 15 T.C. 31 (1950) , affirmed per curiam 192 F. 2d 392 (C.A. 2, 1951); Sam Schnitzer , 13 T.C. 43 (1949) , affirmed per curiam 183 F. 2d 70 (C.A. 9, 1950), certiorari denied 340 U.S. 911 (1951) .
discussed
Cited "see"
Catalina Homes, Inc. v. Commissioner
See Isidor Dobkin, 15 T.C. 31 , 33-34 (1950) , affd. per curiam 192 F. 2d 392 (C.A. 2, 1951), where this Court made certain remarks which are equally applicable to the circumstances now before us: When the organizers of a new enterprise arbitrarily designate as loans the major portion of the funds they lay out in order to get the business established and under way, a strong inference arises that the entire amount paid in is a contribution to the corporation's capital and is placed at risk in the business. * * * The chances that the so-called loans would be repaid depended upon the earnings of …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Samuel D. Collins
v.
United States
v.
United States
12932_1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Nov 9, 1951.
192 F.2d 392
Published
Samuel D. COLLINS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 12932.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
November 9, 1951.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division, Leon R. Yankwich, Judge.
Samuel D. Collins, in pro per.
Ernest A. Tolin, U. S. Atty., Ray H. Kinnison and Bernard B. Laven, Assts. U. S. Atty., all of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and ORR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
1
The order appealed from is affirmed.