Spitzer Akron, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 470 F.2d 1000 (6th Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Spitzer Akron, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 470 F.2d 1000 (6th Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Spitzer Akron, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (ca6, 1976-06-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Spitzer Akron, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
6th Cir. · 1976 · confidence medium
In light of the Supreme Court’s then recent decision in NLRB v. Burns International Security Services Inc., 406 U.S. 272 , 92 S.Ct. 1571 , 32 L.Ed.2d 61 (1972) and NLRB v. Wayne Convalescent Center, 465 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir. 1972), this Court granted enforcement of the Board’s order, 470 F.2d 1000, 1001 (6 Cir. 1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SPITZER AKRON, INC., Petitioner,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent
72-1187.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Nov 27, 1972.
470 F.2d 1000
M. Alfred Roemisch, Donald N. Jaffe, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marion Griffin, Patrick Hardin, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Phillip Fusco, Director, Region 8, N. L. R. B., Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent.
Phillips, Mc-Cree, Cecil.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

This case is before the court on the petition of Spitzer Akron to review and set aside an order issued by the National Labor Relations Board, and on the Board’s cross application for enforcement. The Board’s decision is reported at 195 N.L.R.B. No. 24. Reference is made to the reported decision of the[*1001] Board for a detailed recitation of the facts.

We conclude that there is substantial evidence to support the conclusion of the Board that Spitzer Akron was a successor employer and was obligated to bargain with the Union as the representative of the predecessor employer, all of whom were reemployed by Spitzer Akron. N. L. R. B. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc., 406 U.S. 272, 92 S.Ct. 1571, 32 L.Ed.2d 61 (1972); N. L. R. B. v. Wayne Convalescent Center, Inc., 465 F.2d 1039 (6th Cir. 1972).

We further conclude that all other parts of the decision of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole.

It is ordered that the decision of the Board be enforced.