In the Matter of Clyde R. James, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt. James H. Riggs, Tr. & v. Clyde R. James, Bankrupt & Edward M. Walsh, Tr. & v. Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt &, 470 F.2d 996 (9th Cir. 1972). · Go Syfert
Search
In the Matter of Clyde R. James, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt. James H. Riggs, Tr. & v. Clyde R. James, Bankrupt & Edward M. Walsh, Tr. & v. Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt &, 470 F.2d 996 (9th Cir. 1972). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In the Matter of Franklin Michael Gehrig, Bankrupt. Franklin Michael Gehrig v. Kenneth E. Shreves, Trustee (ca8, 1974-02-06) · Strongest negative: Pallante v. International Venture Investments, Ltd. (ohnd, 1985-10-31)
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972 1999 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" Pallante v. International Venture Investments, Ltd.
N.D. Ohio · 1985 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see In re Cedor, 337 F.Supp. 1103 (N.D.Ga.1972), aff'd, 470 F.2d 996 (9th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 973 , 93 S.Ct. 2148 , 36 L.Ed.2d 697 (1973).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In the Matter of Franklin Michael Gehrig, Bankrupt. Franklin Michael Gehrig v. Kenneth E. Shreves, Trustee (2×)
8th Cir. · 1974 · confidence medium
Finally, as noted in Kokoszka, supra, debtors who face the situation where their non-exempt assets will be entirely eaten up be administration costs, leaving nothing for creditors, can move the bankruptcy court for an order of abandonment. 470 F.2d at 996. 48 I would affirm the judgment of the District Court. 1 Section 70(a)(5) of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. 110(a)(5), in relevant part reads: (a) The trustee of the estate of a bankrupt and his successor or successors, if any, upon his or their appointment and qualification, shall in turn be vested by operation of law with the title of the ba…
cited Cited "see" In the Matter of Edward G. Brissette, Gene Paul Master, Michael Anthony Simon, Bankrupts-Appellants
9th Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Cedor (N.D.Cal.1972) 337 F.Supp. 1103 , aff’d (9th Cir. 1972) 470 F.2d 996 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Clyde R. James, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt. James H. Riggs, Trustee and
v.
Clyde R. James, Bankrupt and Edward M. Walsh, Trustee and v. Michael W. Cedor, Bankrupt And
72-1483.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Dec 22, 1972.
470 F.2d 996
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

470 F.2d 996

73-2 USTC P 9700

In the Matter of Clyde R. JAMES, Bankrupt.
In the Matter of Michael W. CEDOR, Bankrupt.
James H. RIGGS, Trustee and Appellant,
v.
Clyde R. JAMES, Bankrupt and Appellee.
Edward M. WALSH, Trustee and Appellant,
v.
Michael W. CEDOR, Bankrupt and Appellee.

Nos. 72-1483, 72-2311.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 22, 1972.

Burton I. Meyer (argued), of Glicksberg, Kushner & Goldberg, Harvey W. Hoffman, San Francisco, Cal., Robert R. Barton, Oakland, Cal., for appellants.

Thomas R. Adams (argued), Peter H. Reid, Ralph L. Jacobson, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County, Daly City, Cal., Hansen, Jaffe & Weiss, San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.

Lynn Anderson Koller, (argued), of Newmark & Koller, Lafayette, Cal., for amicus curiae.

Before BARNES, KOELSCH and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The challenged Orders of the District Court are affirmed upon the authority of Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18, 91 S.Ct. 113, 27 L.Ed.2d 124 (1970), and the carefully reasoned opinion of District Judge Wollenberg. In re Cedor, 337 F. Supp. 1103 (D.C.N.D.Cal.1972).

2

We cannot see that our opinion in any way conflicts with In re Aveni, 458 F.2d 972 (6th Cir. 1972). There, a clearly different problem was presented.