United States v. Anderson, 556 F.2d 568 (3rd Cir. 1977). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Anderson, 556 F.2d 568 (3rd Cir. 1977). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
71 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 28 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Smith (med, 1985-07-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977 2001 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Smith
D. Me. · 1985 · confidence medium
The Fourth Circuit in Walker also notes “the modern trend toward trying military personnel before district courts where the offense involved is essentially civilian in nature.” 556 F.2d at 568, n. 3.
discussed Cited "see" Wzorek v. City of Chicago
N.D. Ill. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See, for example, Thompson v. Johnson, 410 F.Supp. 633, 643 (E.D.Pa. 1976), affirmed without opinion, 556 F.2d 568 (3d Cir.1977) (deliberate and malicious conduct resulting in mental anguish can be considered in assessing punishment for violation of consent decree).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Far East Suppliers, Inc.
S.D. Fla. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Thompson v. Johnson, 410 F.Supp. 633, 643 (E.D.Pa.1976), affirmed, 556 F.2d 568 (3rd Cir.1977).
cited Cited "see" Erie Bottling Corp. v. Donovan
W.D. Pa. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Thompson v. Johnson, 410 F.Supp. 633 (E.D.Pa.1976), aff’d. 556 F.2d 568 (3d Cir. 1977); United States of America v. Reide, 494 F.2d 644 (2d Cir. 1974).
discussed Cited "see" Bankamerica Corporation v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, National Computer Analysts, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. Bankamerica Corporation v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, National Computer Analysts, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor. Bankamerica Corporation v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, National Computer Analysts, Inc., Intervenor
9th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Memphis Trust, supra, 584 F.2d at 923 n.5 3 Other events could also have retriggered the ninety-one day period, but we need not consider them, because the Delmarva protest properly became a part of the record, thus retriggering the ninety-one day period We also need not pass upon the Board's contention that it had the right to leave the record open pending the Third Circuit's May 5, 1977 decision in National Computer Analysts v. Decimus Corp., 3 Cir., 1977, 556 F.2d 568 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Halderman v. Pennhurst State School & Hospital
E.D. Pa. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Thompson v. Johnson, 410 F.Supp. 633, 640 (E.D.Pa.1976) (fact that prohibited acts committed inadvertently or in good faith does not preclude finding of civil contempt), aff'd, 556 F.2d 568 (3d Cir.1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Anderson
76-1986.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
May 9, 1977.
556 F.2d 568
Published

556 F.2d 568

U. S.
v.
Anderson

No. 76-1986

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

5/9/77

1

D.N.J.

AFFIRMED