Midway Mfg. Co., & Illinois Corp. v. Larry Kruckenberg, Etc., 828 F.2d 13 (11th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Midway Mfg. Co., & Illinois Corp. v. Larry Kruckenberg, Etc., 828 F.2d 13 (11th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“in california, the elements of malicious prosecution are (1) the 14 initiation of criminal prosecution, (2) malicious motivation, and (3) lack of probable cause.”
16 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tafoya v. City of Hanford (caed, 2020-03-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Tafoya v. City of Hanford
E.D. Cal. · 2020 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
in california, the elements of malicious prosecution are (1) the 14 initiation of criminal prosecution, (2) malicious motivation, and (3) lack of probable cause.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Guerra v. KIND, LLC
N.D. Cal. · 2023 · confidence medium
It must also “draw all 12 reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Usher v. City of Los Angeles, 828 F.2d 13 556, 561 (9th Cir. 1987). 14 B.
discussed Cited "see" Intergraph Corp. v. Intel Corp.
N.D. Ala. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. City of Dothan, Ala., 818 F.2d 755, 760 (11th Cir.1987), opinion modified and reh’g denied, 828 F.2d 13 (1987) (finding mandatory injunction issued by district court valid in later proceeding to enforce injunction).
cited Cited "see" Meek v. Metropolitan Dade County, Fla.
S.D. Fla. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. City of Dothan, 818 F.2d 755, 758 , modified, 828 F.2d 13 (11th Cir.1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MIDWAY MANUFACTURING CO., and Illinois Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Larry KRUCKENBERG, Etc., Defendant-Appellant
85-3475.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Sep 21, 1987.
828 F.2d 13
James M. Campbell, The Garland Firm, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant., Stephen J. Calvacca, Paul J. Moriarty, Asst. U.S. Attys., Orlando, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Godbold, Anderson, Atkins.
Published
PER CURIAM:

Prior Report: 779 F.2d 624 (1986).

In light of the decision of the Supreme Court in Young v. United States ex rel. Vuitton, and Klayminc v. United States v. ex rel. Vuitton, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2124, 95 L.Ed.2d 740 (1987), the judgment of the district court finding Kruckenberg guilty of contempt is

REVERSED.