green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
3.2 score
“t is not the definition of an unfair act which controls but the context - the circumstances to which that single definition is applied”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kattar v. Demoulas
t is not the definition of an unfair act which controls but the context - the circumstances to which that single definition is applied
cited
Cited "see"
Swenson v. Yellow Transportation, Inc.
See Kerlinsky v. Fidelity Deposit Co. of Md., 690 F.Supp. 1112, 1117 (D.Mass.1987), aff’d (without op.), 843 F.2d 1383 (1st Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Den Norske Bank v. First Nat. Bank of Boston
A section 11 claimant must show that the objectionable conduct attained “ ‘a level of rascality that would raise an eyebrow of someone inured to the rough and tumble of the world of commerce.’” Quaker State Oil Refining v. Garrity Oil Co., 884 F.2d 1510, 1513 (1st Cir.1989) (citation omitted); accord Kerlinsky v. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, 690 F.Supp. 1112, 1119 (D.Mass.1987), affm’d, 843 F.2d 1383 (1st Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ferrara & DiMercurio, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance
In other words, section 11 requires an interaction which “is ‘commercial’ in nature” between two parties “engaged in ‘trade or commerce.’ ” Linkage Corporation v. Trustees of Boston University, 425 Mass. 1 , 679 N.E.2d 191 (1997); see also Kerlinsky v. Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, 690 F.Supp. 1112, 1117 (D.Mass.1987), affd, 843 F.2d 1383 (1st Cir.1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gos (Irena)
v.
U.S. Department of State, Consulate Division
v.
U.S. Department of State, Consulate Division
87-1552.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Jan 21, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial… (1)
Gos (Irena)
v.
U.S. Department of State, Consulate Division
NO. 87-1552
United States Court of Appeals,
First Circuit.
JAN 21, 1988
1
Appeal From: D.Mass.
2
AFFIRMED.