Samuel Wayne Guy v. State of North Carolina John Wyatt Dickson Cape Fear Valley Hosp. E. Lynn Johnson Edward Grannis, 900 F.2d 252 (4th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Samuel Wayne Guy v. State of North Carolina John Wyatt Dickson Cape Fear Valley Hosp. E. Lynn Johnson Edward Grannis, 900 F.2d 252 (4th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
44 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jimenez Ex Rel. Estate of Jimenez v. Chrysler Corp. (scd, 1999-12-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Jimenez Ex Rel. Estate of Jimenez v. Chrysler Corp.
D.S.C. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at 178 , citing Badders v. Lassiter, 240 N.C. 413 , 82 S.E.2d 357 (1954)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Samuel Wayne Guy
v.
State of North Carolina John Wyatt Dickson Cape Fear Valley Hospital E. Lynn Johnson Edward Grannis
89-6362.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Mar 16, 1990.
900 F.2d 252
Unpublished

900 F.2d 252
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Samuel Wayne GUY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE of NORTH CAROLINA; John Wyatt Dickson; Cape Fear
Valley Hospital; E. Lynn Johnson; Edward
Grannis, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-6362.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 5, 1990.
Decided March 16, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (C/A No. 88-934-CRT).

Samuel Wayne Guy, appellant pro se.

Jacob Leonard Safron, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.

D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Samuel Wayne Guy appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Guy v. State of North Carolina, C/A No. 88-934-CRT (E.D.N.C. Nov. 14, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED