Michael W. Owens v. Edward W. Murray, 960 F.2d 146 (4th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Michael W. Owens v. Edward W. Murray, 960 F.2d 146 (4th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Taylor v. Saul (mdd, 2021-12-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Taylor v. Saul
D. Maryland · 2021 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jackson v. Sullivan, 960 F.2d 146 , 1992 WL 78816, at *3 (4th Cir. 1992) (unpublished table decision) (holding a claimant should not “be moved mechanically to the next age category whenever his chronological age is close to that category”) (quoting Crady v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 835 F.2d 617, 622 (6th Cir. 1987)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." SAUNDERS v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
E.D. Pa. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
Dep’t of Corr., 225 F. Supp. 2d 450, 461 (D.N.J. 2002) (citing Delaney v. DeTella, 256 F.3d 679, 686 (7th Cir. 2001)) (concluding that six-month lockdown violated the Eighth Amendment); see also Hall v. Williams, 960 F.2d 146 (4th Cir. 1992) (reversing the grant of summary judgment in favor of prison officials and remanding for further proceedings on prisoner’s Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim regarding deprivation of exercise privileges during a 4.5 month lockdown).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michael W. Owens
v.
Edward W. Murray
92-6138.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 27, 1992.
960 F.2d 146
Unpublished

960 F.2d 146

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael W. OWENS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-6138.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 9, 1992
Decided: April 27, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-478-R)

Michael W. Owens, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Michael W. Owens appeals from the district court's orders denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) and denying his motion for reconsideration. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Owens v. Murray, No. CA-91478-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 6, 1991 & Jan. 13, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED