United States v. Bradley, 22 F.3d 1094 (5th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Bradley, 22 F.3d 1094 (5th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
64 citation events (23 in the last 25 years) across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: (SS) Spitzer v. Commissioner of Social Security (caed, 2020-04-24)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) (SS) Spitzer v. Commissioner of Social Security
E.D. Cal. · 2020 · confidence medium
See Ingram, 674 F.3d at 928; Kekauoha-Alisa, 674 22 F.3d at 1094. 23 B.
discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice
5th Cir. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Parker v. Smith, 22 F.3d 1094 , 1994 WL 198944 at *2 (5th Cir.1994) (unpublished); see also 5th Cir. R. 47.5.3 (unpublished opinions prior to January 1, 1996, are precedential); cf. Green v. McKaskle, 788 F.2d 1116, 1125 (5th Cir. 1986) (including shelter in list of basic human needs without addressing an inadequate ventilation claim).
cited Cited "see" Jones v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (In Re Jones)
Bankr. E.D. La. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See, In re Lee, 167 B.R. 417 (Bank.S.D.Miss. 1992) aff’d, 22 F.3d 1094 (5th Cir.1994). 26 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Masoumian v. Kijakazi
S.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520 ; see also Tackett v. Apfel, 180 22 F.3d 1094 , 1098-99 (9th Cir. 1999) (describing five steps).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hill v. Plaquemines Parish Sheriff's Office
E.D. La. · 2023 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988) (holding that a party, including a pro se litigant, “bears the burden or keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address”); see also Coleman v. Scott, 22 F.3d 1094 , 1994 WL 198946, at *1 (5th Cir. 1994) (finding no abuse of discretion in dismissal of case for failure to prosecute when pro se plaintiff failed to provide court with address at which he could be reached); Casimir v. Sunrise Fin., Inc., 299 F. App’x 591, 593 (7th Cir. 2008) (“[A]ll litigants, including pro se litigants, are responsible for maintaining …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Bradley
93-01411.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
May 5, 1994.
22 F.3d 1094
Published

22 F.3d 1094

U.S.
v.
Bradley[*]

NO. 93-01411

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

May 05, 1994

1

Appeal From: N.D.Tex.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2