Gary E. Bostick v. Dep't of Transp., 22 F.3d 1105 (Fed. Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Gary E. Bostick v. Dep't of Transp., 22 F.3d 1105 (Fed. Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Engel Industries, Inc. v. The Lockformer Company, Iowa Precision Industries, Inc., and Met-Coil Systems Corporation, Defendants/cross-Appellants (cafc, 1999-02-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Engel Industries, Inc. v. The Lockformer Company, Iowa Precision Industries, Inc., and Met-Coil Systems Corporation, Defendants/cross-Appellants
Fed. Cir. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Engel Indus., Inc. v. Lockformer Co., 96 F.3d 1398 , 40 USPQ2d 1161 (Fed.Cir.1996) (“Engel III ”), Engel Indus., Inc. v. Lockformer Co., 22 F.3d 1105 (Fed.Cir.1994) (Table) (“Engel II”), Engel Indus., Inc., v. Lockformer Co., 946 F.2d 1528 , 20 U.S.P.Q.2d 1300 (Fed.Cir.1991) (“Engel I ”).
cited Cited "see" Travelers Insurance v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mulholland v. United States, 28 Fed.Cl. 320, 333 (1993), affd without op., 22 F.3d 1105 (Fed.Cir. 1994).
cited Cited "see" Maxxam Group Inc. v. United States
S.D. Tex. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mulholland v. United States, 28 Fed.Cl. 320, 334-35 (1993), aff'd 22 F.3d 1105 (Fed.Cir.1995); see also St.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Doyon, Ltd. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Because Doyon admits that the Disputed Sum is not an item of federal tax expense, the foundation of its position rests on its assertion that items of tax benefit come within the meaning of “federal income taxes.” To support its interpretation of the relevant statute, Doyon relies principally on legislative history. 33 We, however, are continuously mindful of the rale of statutory construction, which instructs us that “legislative history ... may be referred to only in instances whe[re] the statutory terms are ambiguous and the intent unclear.” Snap-On Tools Inc. v. United States, 26 Cl…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gary E. Bostick
v.
Department of Transportation
93-3503.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Mar 22, 1994.
22 F.3d 1105
Published

22 F.3d 1105
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

Gary E. BOSTICK, Petitioner,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent.

No. 93-3503.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 22, 1994.

Before MICHEL, CLEVENGER and SCHALL, Circuit Judges:

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

1

AFFIRMED. See Fed.Cir.R. 36.