Pac. Coast Fed'n of Fishermen's Associations, Inc. Inst. for Fisheries Resources Oregon Nat. Resources Council Umpqua Watersheds Coast Range Ass'n Headwaters v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., & Douglas Timber Operators Nw. Forestry Ass'n, Defendants-Intervenors- Pac. Coast Fed'n of Fishermen's Associationg, Inc. Inst. for Fisheries Resources Oregon Nat. Resources Council Umpqua Watersheds Coast Range Ass'n Headwaters v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., & Douglas Timber Operations Nw. Forestry Ass'n, Defendants-Intervenors, 253 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Pac. Coast Fed'n of Fishermen's Associations, Inc. Inst. for Fisheries Resources Oregon Nat. Resources Council Umpqua Watersheds Coast Range Ass'n Headwaters v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., & Douglas Timber Operators Nw. Forestry Ass'n, Defendants-Intervenors- Pac. Coast Fed'n of Fishermen's Associationg, Inc. Inst. for Fisheries Resources Oregon Nat. Resources Council Umpqua Watersheds Coast Range Ass'n Headwaters v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv., & Douglas Timber Operations Nw. Forestry Ass'n, Defendants-Intervenors, 253 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Inc. Institute for Fisheries Resources Oregon Natural Resources Council Umpqua Watersheds Coast Range Association Headwaters v. National Marine Fisheries Service, and Douglas Timber Operators Northwest Forestry Association, Defendants-Intervenors- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associationg, Inc. Institute for Fisheries Resources Oregon Natural Resources Council Umpqua Watersheds Coast Range Association Headwaters v. National Marine Fisheries Service, and Douglas Timber Operations Northwest Forestry Association, Defendants-Intervenors (ca9, 2001-09-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Inc. Institute for Fisheries Resources Oregon Natural Resources Council Umpqua Watersheds Coast Range Association Headwaters v. National Marine Fisheries Service, and Douglas Timber Operators Northwest Forestry Association, Defendants-Intervenors- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associationg, Inc. Institute for Fisheries Resources Oregon Natural Resources Council Umpqua Watersheds Coast Range Association Headwaters v. National Marine Fisheries Service, and Douglas Timber Operations Northwest Forestry Association, Defendants-Intervenors
9th Cir. · 2001 · confidence medium
ORDER 1 The opinion filed May 31, 2001, slip op. 6689 and appearing at 253 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2001) is amended as follows: At slip op. 6707 and 253 F.3d at 1147, delete the last paragraph and replace with: 2 The district court held that the NMFS acted "arbitrarily and capriciously" when it concluded that three sales of timber that grew in or partly in riparian reserves, Salvage II, Sugar Pine Density Management, and Little River, were consistent with ACS objectives.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Ass'n v. National Marine Fisheries Service
9th Cir. · 2001 · confidence medium
ORDER The opinion filed May 31, 2001, slip op. 6689 and appearing at 253 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir.2001) is amended as follows: At slip op. 6707 and 253 F.3d at 1147, delete the last paragraph and replace with: The district court held that the NMFS acted “arbitrarily and capriciously” when it concluded that three sales of timber that grew in or partly in riparian reserves, Salvage II, Sugar Pine Density Management, and Little River, were consistent with ACS objectives.
discussed Cited "see" Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. United States Forest Service
E.D. Cal. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Ass’ns v. National Marine Fisheries Service, 253 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir.2001), amended and superseded by, 265 F.3d 1028 (9th Cir.2001)(finding NMFS’ failure to evaluate the short-term impacts was arbitrary and capricious and noting that “[w]e find nothing in the record to authorize NMFS to assume away significant habitat degradation.”) III.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Inc. Institute for Fisheries Resources Oregon Natural Resources Council Umpqua Watersheds Coast Range Association Headwaters
v.
National Marine Fisheries Service, and Douglas Timber Operators Northwest Forestry Association, Defendants-Intervenors- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associationg, Inc. Institute for Fisheries Resources Oregon Natural Resources Council Umpqua Watersheds Coast Range Association Headwaters v. National Marine Fisheries Service, and Douglas Timber Operations Northwest Forestry Association, Defendants-Intervenors
99-36027.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
May 31, 2001.
253 F.3d 1137
Published

253 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2001)

PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS, INC.; INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES; OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL; UMPQUA WATERSHEDS; COAST RANGE ASSOCIATION; HEADWATERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES,
v.
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, DEFENDANT,
and
DOUGLAS TIMBER OPERATORS; NORTHWEST FORESTRY ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANTS-INTERVENORS- APPELLANTS.
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONG, INC.; INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES; OREGON NATURAL RESOURCES COUNCIL; UMPQUA WATERSHEDS; COAST RANGE ASSOCIATION; HEADWATERS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEES,
v.
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT,
and
DOUGLAS TIMBER OPERATIONS; NORTHWEST FORESTRY ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANTS-INTERVENORS.

Nos. 99-36027, 99-36195

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted June 8, 2000--Seattle, Washington
Submission Vacated September 15, 2000
Resubmitted May 8, 2001
Filed May 31, 2001

1

NOTE: THIS OPINION IS SUPERCEDED BY THE AMENDED OPININON AT 265 F.3d 1028.