Kevin Murphy v. Robert Shaw, 253 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Kevin Murphy v. Robert Shaw, 253 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Murphy v. Shaw (ca9, 2002-10-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Murphy v. Shaw
9th Cir. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murphy v. Shaw, 253 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir.2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kevin Murphy
v.
Robert Shaw, Unit Sergeant Larry Bearley, Hearings Officer Michael Mahoney, Bureau Warden Myron Beeson, Bureau Warden and Richard S. Day, Director, Department of Corrections
97-35989.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Jun 12, 2001.
253 F.3d 1151
2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4830
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 12388
Published

253 F.3d 1151 (9th Cir. 2001)

KEVIN MURPHY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ROBERT SHAW, Unit Sergeant; LARRY BEARLEY, Hearings Officer; MICHAEL MAHONEY, Bureau Warden; MYRON BEESON, Bureau Warden; and RICHARD S. DAY, Director, Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-35989

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Filed June 12, 2001

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court, D.C. No. CV-95-00062-CCL

Before: Betty B. Fletcher, Stephen Reinhardt, and Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

We remand to the district court to determine in light of the opinion in Shaw v. Murphy, 99-1613, April 18, 2001, whether the prison regulations -- particularly the rules forbidding insolence and interference with due process hearings -- as applied to Murphy in this case are "reasonably related to legitimate penological interests" Turner v. Saffley, 482 U.S. 78, 79 (1987), or are vague and overbroad as applied to him.