Donovan Hugh Trevor Crooks v. U.S. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 30 F.3d 129 (4th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Donovan Hugh Trevor Crooks v. U.S. Immigr. & Naturalization Serv., 30 F.3d 129 (4th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Propst v. HWS Co. (ncwd, 2015-12-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Propst v. HWS Co.
W.D.N.C. · 2015 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Harrell v. Hutson, 30 F.3d 129 , 1994 WL 388023, at *3 (4th Cir.1994) (“While appellant may feel that appellees’ actions were discriminatory a subjective belief that one has been discriminated against, no matter how fervent, cannot be the sole basis of judicial relief.”); Eng v. Norfolk Southern Corp., 2005 WL 1245062 , at *5, 2005 U.S. Dist.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Donovan Hugh Trevor Crooks
v.
U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
94-1392.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Aug 3, 1994.
30 F.3d 129
Unpublished

30 F.3d 129

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Donovan Hugh Trevor CROOKS, Petitioner,
v.
U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 94-1392.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 28, 1994
Decided Aug. 3, 1994.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. ( Azj-bgv-itt)

Donovan Hugh Trevor Crooks, petitioner pro se.

Richard Michael Evans, Robert Kendall, Jr., Stewart Deutsch, Charles Ernst Pazar, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

I.N.S.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' (Board) decision and order affirming the immigration judge's denial of his application for waiver of deportation. See 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182(c). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny Crooks's motion for a discretionary stay of deportation and affirm on the reasoning of the Board. In re: Donovan Hugh Trevor Crooks, No. Anq-ibt-gga (B.I.A. Mar. 11, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.