Robert Eugene Ayers v. Edward Murray Attorney Gen. of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 43 F.3d 1465 (4th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Robert Eugene Ayers v. Edward Murray Attorney Gen. of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 43 F.3d 1465 (4th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
55 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Johnson (ncmb, 2008-02-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) In Re Johnson
Bankr. M.D.N.C. · 2008 · confidence medium
Tilley, 789 F.2d at 1077-78 (a label in the agreement erects a “substantial obstacle” for the party seeking to overcome it); Catron, 43 F.3d at 2.
discussed Cited "see" Lawrence v. Combs (In re Combs)
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Catron v. Catron (In re Catron), 164 B.R. 912, 919 (E.D.Va.1994), aff 'd, 43 F.3d 1465 (4th Cir.1994) (unpublished table decision); In re Pagels, 2011 WL 577337 , at *10; In re Austin, 271 B.R. at 106 (citing In re Crosby, 229 B.R. 679, 681 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1998)).
cited Cited "see" In Re Uzaldin
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Catron, 43 F.3d 1465 (4th Cir.1994) (unpublished opinion) (citing In re Robb, 23 F.3d 895, 897 (4th Cir.1994)); Tilley v. Jessee, 789 F.2d 1074 , 1078 n. 4 (4th Cir.1986).
discussed Cited "see" Manzi v. Geenty (In Re Manzi)
Bankr. D. Conn. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Catron v. Catron (In re Catron), 164 B.R. 912 , 916 n. 2 (E.D.Va.1994), aff’d, 43 F.3d 1465 (4th Cir.1994); Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Nappy (In re Nappy), 269 B.R. 277, 296 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1999).
cited Cited "see" In Re Crosby
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Catron v. Catron (In re Catron), 164 B.R. 912, 919 (E.D.Va.1994)(relying on Kettner v. Kettner, 1991 WL 549386 (E.D.Va.1991)(unpublished opinion)), aff'd, 43 F.3d 1465 (4th Cir.1994).
cited Cited "see" Catron v. Morrison (In Re Catron)
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Catron v. Catron (In re Catron), 164 B.R. 908, 910-12 (Bankr.E.D.Va.1992), aff'd, 164 B.R. 912 (E.D.Va.), aff'd without op., 43 F.3d 1465 (4th Cir.1994).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Rosenblum v. Hardesty (In re Hardesty)
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
M.D.N.C.2008); see also Catron v. Catron, 43 F.3d 1465 (4th Cir.1994) (approving a lower court’s use of the four factor analysis).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Poole
Bankr. D.S.C. · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Catron v. Catron (In re Catron), 164 B.R. 912, 919 (E.D.Va.1994), aff'd, 43 F.3d 1465 , 1994 WL 707966 (4th Cir.1994); Boyle v. Donovan, 724 F.2d 681, 683 (8th Cir.1984) (citing Williams v. Williams (In re Williams), 703 F.2d 1055, 1057 (8th Cir., 1983)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert Eugene Ayers
v.
Edward Murray Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia
94-6231.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Nov 10, 1994.
43 F.3d 1465
Unpublished

43 F.3d 1465

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Eugene AYERS, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Edward MURRAY; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, Respondents Appellees.

No. 94-6231.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 18, 1994
Decided Nov. 10, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-93-53)

Robert Eugene Ayers, appellant pro se.

Thomas Cauthorne Daniel, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, Va., for appellees.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ayers v. Murray, No. CA-93-53 (W.D.Va. Jan. 27, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED