Morton Waller v. Tappahannock Ford, Inc., & Ford Motor Co. Albert Lumpkin, Owner of Tappahannock Ford, Inc., 43 F.3d 1469 (4th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Search
Morton Waller v. Tappahannock Ford, Inc., & Ford Motor Co. Albert Lumpkin, Owner of Tappahannock Ford, Inc., 43 F.3d 1469 (4th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
36 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re: Vial v. (ca4, 1997-06-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" In Re: Vial v.
4th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Vial, 43 F.3d 1469 (4th Cir. 1994) (unpublished table decision) (per curiam).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Avery W. Vial, Movant (2×)
4th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Vial, 43 F.3d 1469 (4th Cir.1994) (unpublished table decision) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Fondren v. United States
E.D. Va. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Linder, 561 F.3d 339, 343 (4th Cir.2009) (Motz, J., dissenting); see also United States v. Molen, 43 F.3d 1469 (4th Cir.1994).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morton Waller
v.
Tappahannock Ford, Incorporated, and Ford Motor Company Albert Lumpkin, Owner of Tappahannock Ford, Inc.
94-1027.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Nov 10, 1994.
43 F.3d 1469
Unpublished

43 F.3d 1469

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Morton WALLER, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
TAPPAHANNOCK FORD, INCORPORATED, Defendant Appellee,
and
Ford Motor Company; Albert Lumpkin, Owner of Tappahannock
Ford, Inc., Defendants.

No. 94-1027.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 25, 1994
Decided Nov. 10, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-93-330)

Morton Waller, appellant pro se.

Douglas Andrew Barry, Hutchens & Hutchens, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting judgment to the Defendants on Appellant's federal civil rights claims, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e (1988), and state false advertising claims. Va.Code Ann. Sec. 59.1-68.3 (Michie 1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we grant Appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Waller v. Tappahannock Ford, No. CA-93-330 (E.D. Va. Dec. 1, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED