James N. Keeler, Jr. v. Robert H. Mauney, Warden State of South Carolina Attorney Gen. of South Carolina, 46 F.3d 1125 (4th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
James N. Keeler, Jr. v. Robert H. Mauney, Warden State of South Carolina Attorney Gen. of South Carolina, 46 F.3d 1125 (4th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the primary objective of a limited remedy is to provide the seller an opportunity to tender conforming goods and thereby limit his exposure risk for other damages, while simultaneously providing the purchaser with the benefit of his bargain - i.e. - conforming goods.”
58 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Doman v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC (innd, 2023-10-12)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Doman v. Heartland Recreational Vehicles, LLC
N.D. Ind. · 2023 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the primary objective of a limited remedy is to provide the seller an opportunity to tender conforming goods and thereby limit his exposure risk for other damages, while simultaneously providing the purchaser with the benefit of his bargain - i.e. - conforming goods.
cited Cited "see" Rago v. Samaroo
D. Mass. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lambert v. Pasquotank County Dept. of Social Services, 46 F.3d 1125 , 1125 (4th Cir.1995) (affirming dismissal of petition).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James N. Keeler, Jr.
v.
Robert H. Mauney, Warden State of South Carolina Attorney General of South Carolina
93-6643.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jan 12, 1995.
46 F.3d 1125
Unpublished
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 79%
Citer courts: N.D. Indiana (1)

46 F.3d 1125

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James N. KEELER, Jr., Petitioner Appellant,
v.
Robert H. MAUNEY, Warden; State of South Carolina;
Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents Appellees.

No. 93-6643.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 30, 1994.
Decided Jan. 12, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-92-2203-3-20).

James N. Keeler, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Keeler v. Mauney, No. CA-92-2203-3-20 (D.S.C. May 27, 1994).[*] We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

*

Because of Keeler's procedural default, consideration of his ex post facto claim is precluded