Bruce Allen Settenberg v. State of North Carolina, 56 F.3d 62 (4th Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Bruce Allen Settenberg v. State of North Carolina, 56 F.3d 62 (4th Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
52 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Troy D. Jones (ca5, 1998-07-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Troy D. Jones
5th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Livingston, 56 F.3d 62 , 1995 WL 318592, at **2 (4th Cir.1995) (unpublished opinion); United States v. Latimer, 46 F.3d 1128 , 1995 WL 19342 , at **2-3 (4th Cir.1995) (unpublished opinion).
cited Cited "see, e.g." National Union Fire Insurance of Pittsburgh v. Bank of America, N.A.
D. Maryland · 2003 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., United States v. Arora, 860 F.Supp. 1091 (D.Md.1994) aff'd., 56 F.3d 62 , 1995 WL 318486 (4th Cir.1995).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Cobb v. Rector & Visitors of the University of Virginia
W.D. Va. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Lynch, 56 F.3d 62 , 1995 WL 325670 at *3 (4th Cir.1995) (unpublished) (quoting Scott with approval).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bruce Allen Settenberg
v.
State of North Carolina
95-6248.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
May 26, 1995.
56 F.3d 62
Published

56 F.3d 62
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Bruce Allen SETTENBERG, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of North Carolina, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 95-6248.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 26, 1995.

Bruce Allen Settenberg, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Settenberg v. North Carolina, No. CA-94-1013-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED