green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996
2011
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
American Cyanamid Co. v. Nutraceutical Corp.
See Matrix Essentials, Inc. v. Cosmetic Gallery, Inc., 870 F.Supp. 1237, 1251 (D.N.J.1994) (quoting Matrix Essentials, Inc. v. Emporium Drug Mart, Inc., 988 F.2d 587 , 590 (5th Cir.1993), aff'd, 85 F.3d 612 (3d Cir.1996)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodin Properties-Shore Mall, N v. v. Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc.
See Matrix Essentials, Inc. v. Cosmetic Gallery, Inc., 870 F.Supp. 1237, 1247 (D.N.J.), aff'd, 85 F.3d 612 (3d Cir.1996) (“To establish [a claim for tortious interference with contract or prospective economic advantage under New Jersey law] a plaintiff must prove: (1) an existing contractual relationship; (2) intentional interference *734 with that relationship; (3) the malicious nature of the interference; and (4) damages resulting from the interference.”); Rodin Properties — Shore Mall N.V. v. Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc., Cushman & Wakefield, Inc. and Neal Rodin, Civil Ac…
cited
Cited "see"
Fortes v. Harding
See Ramos v. Vaughn, No. CIV.A.94-2596, 1995 WL 386573 *8 (ED.Pa.1995), aff'd mem. 85 F.3d 612 (3rd Cir.1996).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Hentges
See, e.g., Focus Media, Inc. v. Nat’l Broadcasting Co. (In re Focus Media, Inc.), 378 F.3d 916, 926 (9th Cir.2004) (“ ‘[I]f at least a portion of the debt that is the subject of the petition is undisputed, the undisputed portion is sufficient to create a debt under Section 303(b)(1) not subject to bona fide dispute’ ”), quoting IBM Credit Corp. v. Compuhouse Sys., Inc., 179 B.R. 474, 479 (W.D.Pa.1995), aff'd 85 F.3d 612 (3d Cir.1996); see also In re Food Gallery at Valleybrook, 222 B.R. 480, 489 (Bankr.W.D.Pa.1998); In re Willow Lake Partners II, L.P., 156 B.R. 638, 643 (Bankr.W.D.Mo…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
No. 95-5151
612.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Apr 9, 1996.
85 F.3d 612
Published
Charles P. Haydt, Diane Haydt
v.
Riegel Products Corporation, James River Corp., General
Electric Co., Jersey Central Power and Light, Aetna Caualty
& Surety Co., ABC Corp., No.1 through 6, XYZ Corp. No. 1
through 6, AAA Corp. No. 1 through 3, John Doe Corp., John Doe
NO. 95-5151
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Apr 09, 1996
Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 92-03006,
Brown, J.
1
AFFIRMED.