Emery v. Dreams Spirits Inc, 85 F.3d 622. · Go Syfert
Emery v. Dreams Spirits Inc, 85 F.3d 622. Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
43 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jowers v. BOC Group, Inc. (mssd, 2009-04-01) · Strongest negative: Pleasant v. TLC Liquidation Trust (In Re Tender Loving Care Health Care Services, Inc.) (nyed, 2007-09-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1996 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1996 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Pleasant v. TLC Liquidation Trust (In Re Tender Loving Care Health Care Services, Inc.)
E.D.N.Y · 2007 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Transamerican Nat’l Gas Corp. v. U.S. Customs (In re Transamerican Natural Gas Corp.), 85 F.3d 622 , No. 95-20935, 1996 WL 254974, at *3 (5th Cir. Apr. 18, 1996) (unpublished opinion) (stating, in appeal of bankruptcy court granting motion for reconsideration, that "[l]ike the district court, we review the bankruptcy court's findings of fact under the clearly erroneous standard, while conclusions of law are subject to de novo standard”); Cook Group Inc. v. Wilson (In re Wilson), 248 B.R. 745, 747-48 (M.D.N.C.2000) (same).
discussed Cited "see" Jowers v. BOC Group, Inc.
S.D. Miss. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
Aug. 23, 2007) (Guirola, J.) (using a similar amount-in-controversy jurisdictional analysis: “if successful, [plaintiff] is entitled to compensatory damages, attorney fees, and separate punitive damages”). 278 . 881 So.2d 958, 962 (Miss.Ct.App.2004); see id. at 962-63 (the trial court concluded the plaintiff had "provided appropriate justification of an award of attorney’s fees," but "that the award of attorney's fees would be made only after the presentation of proper proof of attorney’s fees had occurred.” The appellate court concluded that, "[b]ecause there must be a rational basi…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Emery
v.
Dreams Spirits Inc

85 F.3d 622

Emery
v.
Dreams Spirits Inc.

NO. 95-10193

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Apr 19, 1996

Appeal From: N.D.Tex., No. 3:94-CV-985-H

1

AFFIRMED.