green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
14.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“In both ['Wheeling and Hodges ] ... the rights involved were public rights — as opposed to the private rights asserted here — and a judgment declaring a public right may be annulled by subsequent legislation.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Pacific Rivers (1994) ”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Pacific Rivers (199k) ”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Salix v. United States Forest Service
(2×)
pacific rivers (1994)
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Taylor v. State of Ariz.
in both ... the rights involved were public rights - as opposed to the private rights asserted here - and a judgment declaring a public right may be annulled by subsequent legislation.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hoyts Cinemas Corp.
See Cooperativa de Ahorro y Credito Aguada v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., 993 F.2d 269, 273 (1st Cir.1993), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1082 , 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 720 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Stewart v. United States Trustee (In Re Stewart)
See Johnston v. Cigna Corp., 14 F.3d 486, 489 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1082 , 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 720 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Environmental Protection Information Center, Inc. v. Pacific Lumber Co.
See Pacific Rivers Council v. Thomas, 30 F.3d 1050, 1055 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1082 , 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995) (U.S. Forest Service land management plans were “actions that ‘may affect’ the protected salmon because the plans set forth criteria for harvesting resources within the salmon’s habitat”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ryan
See United States v. Ryan, 41 F.3d 361 (8th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1082 , 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stuart v. STATE OF TENNESSEE DEPT. OF SAFETY
(2×)
See United States v. Chandler, 36 F.3d 358, 365 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1082 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995); In re King Properties, 535 Pa. 321 , 635 A.2d 128, 133 (1993). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. One Parcel of Real Estate Located at 25 Sandra Court, Sandwich, Illinois, Appeal of Matthew Enoch and Deanna Lyons
(2×)
See United States v. Chandler, 36 F.3d 358, 365 (4th Cir.1994) (examining “(1) the nexus between the offense and the property and the extent of the property’s role in the offense, (2) the role and culpability of the owner, and (3) the possibility of separating offending property that can be readily separated from the remainder”), certiorari denied, 514 U.S. 1082 , 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Strahan v. Linnon
See Pacific Rivers Council v. Thomas, 30 F.3d at 1054 ("there is little doubt that Congress intended to enact a broad definition of agency action in the ESA, and therefore that the [Forest Service’s land resource management plans] are continuing agency action”), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1082 , 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995); Lane County Audubon Society v. Jamison, 958 F.2d 290 (9th Cir.1992) (holding, inter alia, that document promulgated by Bureau of Land Management for conservation of the northern spotted owl was "agency action” requiring consultation under ESA). 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillip Henry Stands, Also Known as Phillip Henry Atkinson, Also Known as Phillip Henry Creek, United States of America v. Waylon Eric Duran, United States of America v. Miguel J. Duran
See United States v. Ryan, 41 F.3d 361, 366 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Association Of Machinists And Aerospace Workers v. Tennessee Valley Authority
See Kurinsky v. United States, 33 F.3d 594 , 599 (6th Cir.1994) (Bivens actions not subject to § 1658), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1082 , 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995) 5 Until 1946, the Supreme Court did not engage in a search for implied Congressional intent in such cases, but instead reasoned that, under the Rules of Decision Act (now codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1652 ), the state statute of limitations applied of its own force in the absence of a federal pronouncement.
cited
Cited "see"
International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Tennessee Valley Authority
See Kurinsky v. United States, 33 F.3d 594 , 599 (6th Cir.1994) (Bivens actions not subject to § 1658), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillip Henry Stands
See United States v. Ryan, 41 F.3d 361, 366 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. — , 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Southwest Center For Biological Diversity v. U.S. Forest Service
See Pacific Rivers Council v. Thomas, 30 F.3d 1050 , 1054 n.8 (9th Cir. 1994) ("[I]f the agency determines that a particular action will have no effect on an endangered or threatened species, the consultation requirements are not triggered."), cert. denied, 131 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Southwest Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Forest Service
See Pacific Rivers Council v. Thomas, 30 F.3d 1050 , 1054 n. 8 (9th Cir.1994) (“[I]f the agency determines that a particular action will have no effect on an endangered or threatened species, the consultation requirements are not triggered”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Simon Frank Weise, United States of America v. Simon Frank Weise
(2×)
See United States v. Ryan, 41 F.3d 361, 366 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995). 8 Turning to Weise's sentence, Weise contends the district court should have decreased his offense level because he accepted responsibility for his offense.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward J. Hill, Jr., Also Known as Bud Hill
See United States v. Ryan, 41 F.3d 361, 367 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wayne Robert Haggerty, Also Known as Robert Wayne Haggarty, Also Known as Travis Cody
See United States v. Ryan, 9 F.3d 660, 667-69 (8th Cir.1993) (finding 18 U.S.C. § 844 (i) to be enhancement provision), aff'd on reh’g on other grounds, 41 F.3d 361 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995); United States v. Rush, 840 F.2d 574, 577 (8th Cir.) (en banc) (finding Armed Career Criminal Act amendment to possession of firearm statute to be enhancement provision), ce rt. denied, 487 U.S. 1238 , 108 S.Ct. 2908 , 101 L.Ed.2d 940 (1988).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George A. Webster, Jr.
See United States v. Ryan, 41 F.3d 361, 366 (8th Cir.1994)(en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
French Bourekas Inc. v. Turner
(2×)
See Hedges v. Resolution Trust Co., 32 F.3d 1360, 1364 (9th Cir.1994) (finding district court did not abuse its discretion where appellants’ arguments were “wholly without merit” and counsel repeatedly failed to follow proper procedural rules unless ordered by the court), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Logan v. Bennington College Corporation
(2×)
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(b). 15 As we have previously explained, judgment as a matter of law is appropriate when there is "such a complete absence of evidence supporting the verdict that the jury's findings could only have been the result of sheer surmise and conjecture, or [where there is] such an overwhelming amount of evidence in favor of the movant that reasonable and fair minded [persons] could not arrive at a verdict against [the movant]." See Concerned Area Residents For The Env't v. Southview Farm, 34 F.3d 114 , 117 (2d Cir.1994) (internal quotations and citations omitted), cert. denied, --…
discussed
Cited "see"
Peugeot v. United States Trustee (In Re Crayton)
(2×)
See Hedges v. Resolution Trust Corp., 32 F.3d 1360, 1363 (9th Cir.1994) (courts can impose sanctions under its inherent powers or under § 1927 upon finding of recklessness or bad faith), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Certain Real Property Located At 11869 Westshore Drive, Putnam Township, Livingston County, Michigan, Together With All Of Its Fixtures, Improvements And Appurtenances, Kathryn Duprie
(2×)
See United States v. Chandler, 36 F.3d 358 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Certain Real Property
(2×)
See United States v. Chandler, 36 F.3d 358 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995).
cited
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Resolution Trust Corp.
See Howe v. Varity Corp., 36 F.3d 746, 753-54 (8th Cir.1994), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 720 (1995); Fischer v. Philadelphia Elec.
cited
Cited "see"
Multi-Channel TV Cable Co. v. Charlottesville Quality Cable Corp.
See Johnston v. Cigna Corp., 14 F.3d 486, 489 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 720 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
Multi-Channel Tv Cable Company, D/B/A Adelphia Cable Communications v. Charlottesville Quality Cable Corporation, a Virginia Corporation Charlottesville Quality Cable Operating Company, a Virginia Corporation Management Services Corporation of Charlottesville, a Virginia Corporation Madison Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited Partnership Cabell Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited Partnership Brandon Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited Partnership Four Seasons Apartments Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited Partnership Sherwood Manor Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited Partnership George B. McCallum Iii, Trustee of Oxford Hill Land Trust David W. Kudravetz, Trustee of Oxford Hill Land Trust L-R Investments, a Virginia Limited Partnership, Multi-Channel Tv Cable Company, D/B/A Adelphia Cable Communications v. Charlottesville Quality Cable Corporation, a Virginia Corporation Charlottesville Quality Cable Operating Company, a Virginia Corporation Management Services Corporation of Charlottesville, a Virginia Corporation Madison Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited Partnership Cabell Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited Partnership Brandon Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited Partnership Four Seasons Apartments Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited Partnership Sherwood Manor Limited Partnership, a Virginia Limited Partnership George B. McCallum Iii, Trustee of Oxford Hill Land Trust David W. Kudravetz, Trustee of Oxford Hill Land Trust L-R Investments, a Virginia Limited Partnership
See Johnston v. Cigna Corp., 14 F.3d 486, 489 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 720 (1995). 27 The Fifth Amendment provides that private property may not be "taken" by the federal government without just compensation, U.S. Const. amend.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leroy Carolina
See Johnston v. Cigna Corp., 14 F.3d 486, 489 (10th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1792 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see"
No. 95-1349
See Kurinsky v. United States, 33 F.3d 594, 599 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995); Industrial Constructors Corp. v. United States Bureau of Reclamation, 15 F.3d 963, 968-69 (10th Cir.1994); Van Strum v. Lawn, 940 F.2d 406, 410 (9th Cir.1991); Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463, 469-70 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 , 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); Chin v. Bowen, 833 F.2d 21, 23-24 (2d Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanchez v. United States
See Kurinsky v. United States, 33 F.3d 594, 599 (6th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995); Industrial Constructors Corp. v. United States Bureau of Reclamation, 15 F.3d 963, 968-69 (10th Cir.1994); Van Strum v. Lawn, 940 F.2d 406, 410 (9th Cir.1991); Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463, 469-70 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 , 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989); Chin v. Bowen, 833 F.2d 21, 23-24 (2d Cir.1987).
cited
Cited "see"
19 Employee Benefits Cas. 2168, Pens. Plan Guide P 23915v
See Howe v. Varity Corp., 36 F.3d 746 , 753-54 (8th Cir.1994), cert. granted, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 720 (1995); Fischer v. Philadelphia Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Timmons v. Rose Acceptance, Inc. (In re Timmons)
“District courts may grant a Rule 60(b)(6) motion only in ‘extraordinary circumstances’ and only when such action is necessary to accomplish justice.” Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & Trust, 994 F.2d 716, 729 (10th Cir.1993); see also Johnston v. Cigna Corp., 14 F.3d 486, 497 (10th Cir.1993) (“Relief under Rule 60(b)(6) ... is warranted only in exceptional circumstances”), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1082 , 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 720 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ciccimaro v. Emore (In Re Ciccimaro)
(2×)
See, e.g., Hedges v. Resolution Trust Corp., 32 F.3d 1360, 1363 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1082 , 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995); In re Ellsworth, 158 B.R. 856, 858 (M.D.Fla.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pope v. Gordon
(2×)
See, e.g., Medlock, 322 S.C. at 132 , 470 S.E.2d *583 at 377 (adopting “excessive fíne test” set forth by Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. Chandler, 36 F.3d 358 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1082 , 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995)); Condon v. One 1985 BMW, 4 Door, VIN # WBAAE6403F0704170, 312 S.C. 431, 432 , 440 S.E.2d 895, 896 (Ct.App.1994)(applying Fourth Circuit cases to determine whether seized vehicle facilitated the unlawful transportation of controlled substances under sections 44-53-520(a)(4), (a)(6)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Basim Omar Sabri
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Ryan, 41 F.3d 361, 363 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc) (concluding that the express jurisdictional element contained in 18 U.S.C. § 844 (i) was merely an element of the offense and that "the court [would] not by the failure of proof on that element [be] deprived of judicial jurisdiction"), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1082 , 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995). 4 Although the Sixth Circuit has applied Dakota as good law, it has questioned its validity.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Detroit Diesel Corp. v. Lane-Smith
As authority for a partitioning of benefits, Spivey cites ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1132 , which provides that a civil action may be brought by a plan participant, beneficiary, or fiduciary to enjoin any act or practice which violates any provision of this subchapter or the terms of the plan, or (B) to obtain other appropriate equitable relief (i) to redress such violations or (ii) to enforce any provisions of this subchapter or the terms of the plan. 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (a)(3)(emphasis added); see also Varity Corp. v. Howe, 514 U.S. 1082 , 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 720 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jeremiah A. Jacobs
See, e.g., United States v. Morris, 18 F.3d 562, 565-66 (8th Cir.1994), and United States v. Jennings, 12 F.3d 836, 838-40 (8th Cir.1994); see also United States v. Ryan, 41 F.3d 361, 366 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, 514 U.S. 1082 , 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rivermeadows Associates, Ltd. v. Falcey (In Re Rivermeadows Associates, Ltd.)
(2×)
Compare Hedges v. RTC, 32 F.3d 1360, 1364 (9th Cir.1994) (District courts may impose sanctions under Fed.R.Bankr.P. 9011 in appeals from bankruptcy courts because “court” is defined by Fed.R.Bankr.P. 9001(4) as “the judicial officer before whom a ease or proceedings is pending.”), cert. denied, — U.S. *270 —, 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995) with Franchise Tax Board v. Roberts (In re Roberts), 175 B.R. 339 , 345 n. 4 (9th Cir.BAP 1994) (Bankruptcy Appellate Panel may impose sanctions under Fed.R.App.P. 38).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Ga. v. City of East Ridge, Tenn.
See, e.g., Concerned Area Residents for the Environment v. Southview Farm, 34 F.3d 114, 118 (2d Cir.1994) (lay witnesses saw manure flowing in a ditch), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995); United States v. Strandquist, 993 F.2d 395, 397-98 (4th Cir.1993) (lay witnesses saw sewage on a storm grate and noticed a strong, foul odor).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Sardone
(2×)
See, e.g., Hedges v. Resolution Trust Corp., 32 F.3d 1360, 1363 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995); Friedman v. State of Arizona, 912 F.2d 328, 333 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied by Naftel v. Arizona, 498 U.S. 1100 , 111 S.Ct. 996 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1079 (1991); Hernandez v. Whiting, 881 F.2d 768, 770-71 (9th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tellevik v. REAL PROPERTY IN PIERCE CTY.
(2×)
We therefore conclude that forfeiture under these provisions ... is subject to the limitations of the Eighth Amendment's Excessive Fines Clause. 509 U.S. at 621-22 , 113 S.Ct. at 2812 (footnote omitted). [15] Austin, 509 U.S. at 621-22 , 113 S.Ct. at 2811-12 . [16] See Austin, 509 U.S. at 622-23 , 113 S.Ct. at 2812 . [17] Austin, 509 U.S. at 622-23 , 113 S.Ct. at 2812 . [18] Austin, 509 U.S. at 627-28 , 113 S.Ct. at 2815 (Scalia, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment); see also United States v. Chandler, 36 F.3d 358, 365 (4th Cir.1994) (adopting a multi-factor instrumentality t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tellevik v. Real Property Known as 6717 100th Street S.W.
Austin, 509 U. S. at 627-28 (Scalia, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment); see also United States v. Chandler, 36 F.3d 358, 365 (4th Cir. 1994) (adopting a multi-factor instrumentality test), cert, denied, 115 S. Ct. 1792 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
No. 94-6643
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Chandler, 36 F.3d 358 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. One Parcel Property Located at 427 & 429 Hall Street
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Chandler, 36 F.3d 358 (4th Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re John H. Gledhill and Gloria K. Gledhill, Debtors, State Bank of Southern Utah v. John H. Gledhill and Gloria K. Gledhill
(2×)
"District courts may grant a Rule 60(b)(6) motion only in 'extraordinary circumstances' and only when such action is necessary to accomplish justice." Lyons v. Jefferson Bank & Trust, 994 F.2d 716, 729 (10th Cir.1993); see also Johnston v. Cigna Corp., 14 F.3d 486, 497 (10th Cir.1993) ("Relief under Rule 60(b)(6) ... is warranted only in exceptional circumstances"), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 720 (1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter, Plaintiff-Counter v. Cedar Point Oil Company Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellant. Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter, Plaintiff-Counter v. Cedar Point Oil Company Inc., Defendant-Counter Claimant-Appellee
(2×)
See, e.g., Concerned Area Residents for Env't v. Southview Farm, 34 F.3d 114 , 117 (2nd Cir.1994), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995); Carr, 931 F.2d at 1061 ; Menzel v. County Utils.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sierra Club, Lone Star Chapter v. Cedar Point Oil Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Concerned Area Residents for Env’t v. Southview Farm, 34 F.3d 114 , 117 (2nd Cir.1994), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995); Carr, 931 F.2d at 1061 ; Menzel v. County Utils.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gregory Lee Martin, Sr.
United States v. Menzer, 29 F.3d 1223, 1230 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 515 , 130 L.Ed.2d 422 (1994); Stillwell, 900 F.2d at 1110 ; see also United States v. Ryan, 41 F.3d 361, 364 (8th Cir.1994) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 1793 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995); United States v. Mayberry, 896 F.2d 1117, 1120 (8th Cir.1990); United States v. Voss, 787 F.2d 393, 397 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 888 , 107 S.Ct. 286 , 93 L.Ed.2d 261 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Bennett Tanner
(2×)
See also, e.g., United States v. Chandler, 36 F.3d 358, 363 (4th Cir.1994) (noting “a forfeiture of property effects punishment on its owner”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 1792 , 131 L.Ed.2d 721 (1995).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clarence L. HEDGES, through Patricia Hedges BECKETT, his Personal Representative
v.
RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as Receiver of Gibraltar Savings, F.A., etc.
v.
RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as Receiver of Gibraltar Savings, F.A., etc.
No. 94-1246.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 24, 1995.
Published
Citer courts: D. Montana (2) · D. Arizona (1)
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.