green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.5 score
“cohen's handbook”
Treatment trajectory · 1924 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1924
1975
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Citizens Against Casino Gambling v. Chaudhuri
cohen's handbook
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bowling v. States
This ruling and judgment were affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals, but were reversed by the Supreme Court, and the case was sent back for a new trial. 261 Fed. 657 ; 256 U. S. 484 , 41 Sup. Ct. 561, 65 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Bowling, 256 U.S. 484, 486-87 , 41 S.Ct. 561 , 65 L.Ed. 1054 (1921).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arenas v. United States
See, United States v. Bowling, 1921, 256 U.S. 484 , 41 S.Ct. 561 , 65 L.Ed. 1054 ; First Moon v. White Tail and United States, 1926, 270 U.S. 243 , 46 S.Ct. 246 , 70 L.Ed. 565 ; Caesar v. Krow, 1918, 71 Okl. 233 , 176 P. 927, 930 ; Redeagle v. Channing, 1930, 146 Okl. 288 , 294 P. 93 . 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
Oklahoma Tax Commission v. United States
See United States v. Bowling, 256 U.S. 484 , 41 S. t. 561, 65 L.Ed. 1054 ; cf. State of Minnesota v. United States, 305 U.S. 382 , 59 S.Ct. 292 , 83 L.Ed. 235 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Camp Easton Forever, Inc v. Inland NW Council Boy Scouts of Amierica
See, e.g., United States v. Bowling, 256 U.S. 484, 486 , 41 S.Ct. 561, 562 , 65 L.Ed. 1054 (1921); Blanset v. Cardin, 256 U.S. 319, 321 , 41 S.Ct. 519, 520 , 65 L.Ed. 950 (1921); Rand v. United States, 249 U.S. 503, 508 , 39 S.Ct. 359, 360 , 63 L.Ed. 731 (1919).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Camp Easton Forever, Inc. v. Inland Northwest Council Boy Scouts of America
See, e.g., United States v. Bowling, 256 U.S. 484, 486 , 41 S.Ct. 561, 562 , 65 L.Ed. 1054 [-] (1921); Blanset v. Cardin, 256 U.S. 319, 321 , 41 S.Ct. 519, 520 , 65 L.Ed. 950 [952-53] (1921); Rand v. United States, 249 U.S. 503, 508 , 39 S.Ct. 359, 360 , 63 L.Ed. 731 [734] (1919).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rockefeller v. Hogue
See, also, United States v. Bowling, 256 U. S. 484 , 41 S. Ct. 561 , 65 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Walther v. McDonald
See, also, United States v. Bowling, 256 U. S. 484 , 41 S. Ct. 561 , 65 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hardesty v. Gordon
(2×)
See, also, Culpepper v. Ocheltree, 256 U. S. 483 , 41 S. Ct. 579 , 65 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Culpepper
v.
Ocheltree
v.
Ocheltree
292.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1921.
Mr. Samuel Herrxck, with whom Mr. Henry M. Willis was on the brief, for petitioner., Mr. Patrick H. Loughran for respondent.
Van Devanter.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
Mr. Justice Van Devanter
deliveredr the opinion of the court.
This case is in all material respects like McLaren v. Fleischer, ante, 477. It was decided in the same way by the state courts and . was argued with that case here. Therefore the opinion in that will suffice to dispose of this.
Judgment affirmed.