green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2010 ·
…if the defendant selects a trademark or trade name similar to the plaintiffs with intent to palm off his wares as those of the plaintiff, proof of his intent may be strong evidence of ... the likelihood of confusion.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1949 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1949
1987
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. Google Inc.
(2×)
if the defendant selects a trademark or trade name similar to the plaintiffs with intent to palm off his wares as those of the plaintiff, proof of his intent may be strong evidence of ... the likelihood of confusion.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Spencer v. United States
Hironimus v. Durant, 4 Cir., 168 F.2d 288 , certiorari denied, 335 U.S. 818 , 69 S.Gt. 40, 93 L.Ed. 373 ; Gratiot v. United States, 4 How. 80 , 11 L.Ed. 884 .
cited
Cited "see"
Patrick F. Moran v. R&W Construction, Inc.
See Hironimus v. Durant, 168 F.2d 288, 289-90 (4th Cir.) (discussing the status and obligations of a soldier on terminal leave), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 818 , 69 S.Ct. 40 , 93 L.Ed. 373 (1948).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stix Products, Inc. v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.
(2×)
See also Best & Co. v. Miller, 167 F.2d 374, 379-380 (2d Cir.) (Clark, L, dissenting), cert. denied, 335 U.S. 818 , 69 S.Ct. 39 , 93 L.Ed. 373 (1948), for other examples. 17 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bath Mills, Inc.
v.
Odom
v.
Odom
No. 113.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1948.
P. F. Henderson for petitioner., Henry Hammer for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Virginia (2)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.