Holliday v. Governor of South Carolina, 335 U.S. 803 (1948). · Go Syfert
Search
Holliday v. Governor of South Carolina, 335 U.S. 803 (1948). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jernigan v. State of Miss. (mssd, 1993-02-02)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Jernigan v. State of Miss.
S.D. Miss. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Holliday v. Gov *693 ernor of South Carolina, 78 F.Supp. 918 (W.D.S.C.), aff’d, 335 U.S. 803 , 69 S.Ct. 56 , 93 L.Ed. 360 (1948) (where plaintiff sought to enjoin enforcement of statute making certain machines illegal gambling devices and subject to seizure and destruction, court found no due process right); cf. Lawton v. Steele, 152 U.S. 133 , 14 S.Ct. 499 ,‘ 38 L.Ed. 385 (1894) (legislature may declare that which is perfectly innocent in itself to be unlawful and may annex to the prohibited act all the incidents of a criminal offense, including the destruction of property denoun…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holliday
v.
Governor of South Carolina
No. 249.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1948.
335 U.S. 803
Henry Hammer for appellants., John M. Daniel, Attorney General of South Carolina, T. C. Callison and J. Monroe Fulmer, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.