green
Positive treatment
6.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951
1988
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wright Contracting Co.
(2×)
See Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981, 986-87 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950).
discussed
Cited "see"
Karl Lee Phillips v. United States
See Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 71 (1950); United States v. Buechler, 557 F.2d 1002 (3d Cir. 1977); 2 United States v. Follette, 32 F.Supp. 953 (E.D.Pa.1940).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald L. Vaughn
(4×)
See Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981, 986-87 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950). 3 Here, the condition falls within one of the enumerated types.
discussed
Cited "see"
Morrissey v. Curran
(2×)
See Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950).” d.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fred Ferrara and Arthur Russell
(2×)
See Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morpul, Inc. v. Glen Raven Knitting Mill, Inc.
(2×)
See Smith v. Florence-Mayo Nuway Co., 182 F.2d 507 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950); Smith v. General Foundry Mach.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stoehr
(2×)
See Karrell v. United States, 9 Cir., 1950, 181 F.2d 981, 986 , certiorari denied 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 ; United States v. Follette, D.C.Pa.1940, 32 F.Supp. 953 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States of America, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Claimant-Appellee v. Leif D. Soderling, in Re Paul B. Andrew, C.P.M., Receiver. United States of America Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Jay S. Soderling, United States of America v. Leif Soderling, (Three Cases) United States of America v. Jay S. Soderling, (Four Cases) United States of America v. Leif D. Soderling Jay S. Soderling, United States of America v. Leif Soderling Jay S. Soderling, United States of America v. Leif D. Soderling Jay S. Soderling, United States of America v. Leif D. Soderling Jay S. Soderling, United States of America v. Leif Soderling
(2×)
Compare Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981, 986 (9th Cir.) (restitution under FPA is limited to losses sustained by the victim as a result of the offense for which the defendant was convicted), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950), with Hughey, 495 U.S. at 420 , 110 S.Ct. at 1984 (restitution under VWPA limited to loss caused by the conduct underlying the offense of conviction).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Soderling
(2×)
Compare Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981, 986 (9th Cir.) (restitution under FPA is limited to losses sustained by the victim as a result of the offense for which the defendant was convicted), cer t. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950), with Hughey, 495 U.S. at 420 , 110 S.Ct. at 1984 (restitution under VWPA limited to loss caused by the conduct underlying the offense of conviction).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ROSENBERG BY ROSENBERG v. Cahill
See also Kelly v. Carroll, 36 Wash.2d 482 , 219 P.2d 79, 85 (1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 392 , 71 S.Ct. 208 , 95 L.Ed. 646 *333 (“[T]he legislature required drugless healers to pursue certain studies in order that they would know enough not to injure patients, and to recognize cases where their limited methods are inefficacious and the services of a doctor are required.”); Janssen v. Holder, supra, 232 Mich. 183 , 205 N.W. 159 (chiropractor could be found liable for not ascertaining nature of infectious disease); Ison v. McFall, 55 Tenn.App. 326 , 400 S.W. 2d 243, 258-59 (1964) (where pa…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bausch
(2×)
The federal probation statute, 18 U.S.C.A. §' 3651, permits “restitution or reparation to aggrieved parties for actual damages or loss caused by the offense for which . . . the defendant is convicted either after a trial or a plea of guilty.” United States v. Tiler, 602 F.2d 30, 33 (2 Cir. 1979); see, e. g., Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981, 986-987 (9 Cir. 1950), cert. den. 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950); United States v. Taylor, 305 F.2d 183, 187 (4 Cir. 1962), cert. den. 371 U.S. 894 , 83 S.Ct. 193 , 9 L.Ed.2d 126 (1962), reh’g den. 371 U.S. 943 , 83 S.Ct. 32…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Eilts
(2×)
See, e.g., Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 95 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bong Shew Cheung
(2×)
See, e. g., Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 [ 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 ] (1950).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad Co.
(2×)
See also California State Board of Equalization v. Goggin, 183 F.2d 489 (9 Cir. 1950) (where Chapter XI receiver would have had to pay penalty on pre-bankruptcy tax to have avoided subsequent tax penalties, including penalty on post-Chapter XI tax, subsequent penalties were not allowable since receiver could not legally pay first penalty), cert. den. 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 207 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Herman L. Taylor
(2×)
See, e. g., Karrell v. United States, 181 F.2d 981 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 891 , 71 S.Ct. 206 , 95 L.Ed. 646 (1950), (case remanded for modification of probation order when part of such order declared invalid).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Karrell
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 343.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 27, 1950.
John W. Preston for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney, Robert S. Erdahl and Felicia H. Dubrovsky for the United States.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.