United States v. Penner Installation Corp., 340 U.S. 898 (1950). · Go Syfert
United States v. Penner Installation Corp., 340 U.S. 898 (1950). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the contracting officer must act impartially in settling disputes. he must not act as a representative of one of the contracting parties, but as an impartial, unbiased judge.”
33 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 16 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: BAE Systems Land & Armaments, L.P. v. Ibis Tek, LLC (mnd, 2016-06-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1952 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1952 1989 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) BAE Systems Land & Armaments, L.P. v. Ibis Tek, LLC
D. Minnesota · 2016 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the contracting officer must act impartially in settling disputes. he must not act as a representative of one of the contracting parties, but as an impartial, unbiased judge.
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. First National City Bank
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Howard v. United States, 182 F. 2d 908, 914 (8th Cir.1950), vacated as moot, 340 U.S. 898 , 71 S.Ct. 278 , 95 L.Ed. 651 (1950). .
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. First National City Bank
1st Cir. · 1968 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Howard v. United States, 182 F. 2d 908, 914 (8th Cir.1950), vacated as moot, 340 U.S. 898 , 71 S.Ct. 278 , 95 L.Ed. 651 (1950). 10 The omission of bankers cannot be considered accidental.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Penner Installation Corp.
No. 170.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 11, 1950.
340 U.S. 898
1950 U.S. LEXIS 1316
Paul A. Sweeney argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman and Acting Assistant Attorney General Clapp. Albert Foreman argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was M. Carl Levine.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 32 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 61%
Citer courts: D. Minnesota (1)
Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.